From: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] futex: replace get_user_pages() with get_user_pages_fast()
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:11:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E035785.6050504@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E02DB80.10303@jp.fujitsu.com>
On 06/22/2011 11:21 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there any reason to take mmap_sem explicitly here?
> Should we change gup_fast() to allow NULL argument (ie for avoid get_page)?
>
> ============================
> down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> get_user_pages(current, current->mm)
> up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
>
> and
>
> get_user_pages_fast()
>
> make an equivalent result, And latter would be better when mamp_sem
> highly contended case, because it can avoid to take mmap_sem if
> the target page doesn't need a page fault.
I can't speak authoritatively here, but it seems to me that
get_user_pages_fast falls back to get_user_pages with mmap_sem anyway,
so this seems like a reasonable optimization for the best case, with a
minor overhead for the slow case.
Peter, am I missing something? Is there a reason you left this as is
during your fast gup futex update?
>
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> kernel/futex.c | 8 +++-----
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
> index fe28dc2..9f7b1ae 100644
> --- a/kernel/futex.c
> +++ b/kernel/futex.c
> @@ -351,13 +351,11 @@ static inline void put_futex_key(union futex_key *key)
> */
> static int fault_in_user_writeable(u32 __user *uaddr)
> {
> - struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
> int ret;
> + struct page *page;
>
> - down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> - ret = get_user_pages(current, mm, (unsigned long)uaddr,
> - 1, 1, 0, NULL, NULL);
> - up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> + ret = get_user_pages_fast((unsigned long)uaddr, 1, 1, &page);
> + put_page(page);
>
> return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
> }
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-23 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-23 6:21 [RFC PATCH] futex: replace get_user_pages() with get_user_pages_fast() KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-06-23 15:11 ` Darren Hart [this message]
2011-06-23 15:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E035785.6050504@linux.intel.com \
--to=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox