From: Olaf Freyer <aaron667@gmx.net>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Cc: Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 08:37:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E0C1995.20009@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110628150644.14805e83@jbarnes-desktop>
Am 29.06.2011 00:06, schrieb Jesse Barnes:
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 00:01:58 +0200
> Olaf Freyer <aaron667@gmx.net> wrote:
>
>> Am 28.06.2011 23:18, schrieb Jesse Barnes:
>>> Ok interesting, didn't realize X startup was so GPU intensive. :)
>>>
>>> The patch you reverted will definitely cause the GPU to ramp up its
>>> frequency much faster than before, but it sounds like on your system
>>> you might also see it with the revert if you run something GPU
>>> intensive like nexuiz.
>>>
>>> The CPU (and by extension the GPU) will take care of itself though; if
>>> things get too hot or over power, it will clock throttle to keep itself
>>> in a safe range.
>> I also see the message alot during my daily average usage of my computer
>> (just using Firefox, Thunderbird and IntelliJ) - seeing things like
>> CPU3: Package power limit notification (total events = 90809)
>> after a normal day in the office became normal since 2.6.39.
>>
>> I just gave nexuiz a try for about 30 minutes with the reversal patch
>> applied -
>> and not a single message appeared in my logs.
> Sounds like with the patch reverted we can't drive your GPU and CPU
> hard enough to generate the messages. Not sure if that's a good thing
> or a bad thing though...
>
I'm not sure either. I saw a single notification event yesterday while
in office -
previously I would have recieved 70000-90000 during that timeframe.
I consider the pure amount of notifications unsettling - and in case of
some
"real" issue it might even get lost inbetween those notifications.
Maybe there is a possible compromise between the situation before and
after the patch? I'm willing to lose a few percent of GPU performance just
for the sake of getting lost of those notification events...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-30 6:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-22 13:01 Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39 Olaf Freyer
2011-05-25 15:40 ` Olaf Freyer
2011-06-02 16:50 ` Olaf Freyer
2011-06-26 16:27 ` Florian Mickler
2011-06-28 20:46 ` Olaf Freyer
2011-06-28 20:59 ` Jesse Barnes
2011-06-28 21:09 ` Olaf Freyer
2011-06-28 21:18 ` Jesse Barnes
2011-06-28 22:01 ` Olaf Freyer
2011-06-28 22:06 ` Jesse Barnes
2011-06-30 6:37 ` Olaf Freyer [this message]
2011-07-22 16:10 ` Jesse Barnes
2011-05-29 19:53 ` Maciej Rutecki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E0C1995.20009@gmx.net \
--to=aaron667@gmx.net \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=florian@mickler.org \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=keithp@keithp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox