From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 09/19] KVM: MMU: split kvm_mmu_free_page
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 16:23:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E0C326E.5070604@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E0C3178.2080603@cn.fujitsu.com>
Split kvm_mmu_free_page to kvm_mmu_isolate_page and
kvm_mmu_free_page
One is used to remove the page from cache under mmu lock and the other is
used to free page table out of mmu lock
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++---
1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index 91d3069..2f8543c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -1039,14 +1039,28 @@ static inline void kvm_mod_used_mmu_pages(struct kvm *kvm, int nr)
percpu_counter_add(&kvm_total_used_mmu_pages, nr);
}
-static void kvm_mmu_free_page(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
+/*
+ * Remove the sp from shadow page cache, after call it,
+ * we can not find this sp from the cache, and the shadow
+ * page table is still valid.
+ * It should be under the protection of mmu lock.
+ */
+static void kvm_mmu_isolate_page(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
{
ASSERT(is_empty_shadow_page(sp->spt));
hlist_del(&sp->hash_link);
- list_del(&sp->link);
- free_page((unsigned long)sp->spt);
if (!sp->role.direct)
free_page((unsigned long)sp->gfns);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Free the shadow page table and the sp, we can do it
+ * out of the protection of mmu lock.
+ */
+static void kvm_mmu_free_page(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
+{
+ list_del(&sp->link);
+ free_page((unsigned long)sp->spt);
kmem_cache_free(mmu_page_header_cache, sp);
}
@@ -1678,6 +1692,7 @@ static void kvm_mmu_commit_zap_page(struct kvm *kvm,
do {
sp = list_first_entry(invalid_list, struct kvm_mmu_page, link);
WARN_ON(!sp->role.invalid || sp->root_count);
+ kvm_mmu_isolate_page(sp);
kvm_mmu_free_page(sp);
} while (!list_empty(invalid_list));
--
1.7.5.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-30 8:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-30 8:19 [PATCH v3 01/19] KVM: MMU: fix walking shadow page table Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30 8:19 ` [PATCH v3 02/19] KVM: MMU: do not update slot bitmap if spte is nonpresent Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30 8:20 ` [PATCH v3 03/19] KVM: x86: introduce vcpu_mmio_gva_to_gpa to cleanup the code Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30 8:20 ` [PATCH v3 04/19] KVM: MMU: cache mmio info on page fault path Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-05 19:04 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-07-06 1:17 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30 8:21 ` [PATCH v3 05/19] KVM: MMU: optimize to handle dirty bit Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-05 19:27 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-07-06 1:22 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-06 16:51 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-07-06 19:12 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-07 8:15 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-06-30 8:21 ` [PATCH v3 06/19] KVM: MMU: cleanup for FNAME(fetch) Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30 8:22 ` [PATCH v3 07/19] KVM: MMU: rename 'pt_write' to 'emulate' Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30 8:22 ` [PATCH v3 08/19] KVM: MMU: count used shadow pages on prepareing path Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30 8:23 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2011-06-30 8:23 ` [PATCH v3 10/19] KVM: MMU: remove bypass_guest_pf Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30 8:24 ` [PATCH v3 11/19] KVM: MMU: filter out the mmio pfn from the fault pfn Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-06 17:17 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-07-06 19:13 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30 8:24 ` [PATCH v3 12/19] KVM: MMU: abstract some functions to handle " Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30 8:25 ` [PATCH v3 13/19] KVM: MMU: introduce the rules to modify shadow page table Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30 8:25 ` [PATCH v3 14/19] KVM: MMU: clean up spte updating and clearing Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-06 17:39 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-07-06 19:18 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-07 8:16 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-07-07 9:30 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30 8:26 ` [PATCH v3 15/19] KVM: MMU: do not need atomicly to set/clear spte Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30 8:26 ` [PATCH v3 16/19] KVM: MMU: lockless walking shadow page table Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-06 18:08 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-07-06 19:26 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-07 8:18 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-06-30 8:26 ` [PATCH v3 17/19] KVM: MMU: reorganize struct kvm_shadow_walk_iterator Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30 8:27 ` [PATCH v3 18/19] KVM: MMU: mmio page fault support Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-06 18:52 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-07-06 19:59 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-07 8:49 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-06-30 8:28 ` [PATCH v3 19/19] KVM: MMU: trace mmio page fault Xiao Guangrong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E0C326E.5070604@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox