public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 14/19] KVM: MMU: clean up spte updating and clearing
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 16:25:34 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E0C32FE.2020805@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E0C3178.2080603@cn.fujitsu.com>

Clean up the code between mmu_spte_clear_* and mmu_spte_update

Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c |   75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
 1 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index 48c0a45..857d0d6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -279,24 +279,51 @@ static u64 __xchg_spte(u64 *sptep, u64 new_spte)
 #endif
 }
 
-static bool spte_has_volatile_bits(u64 spte)
+static bool spte_is_bit_cleared(u64 old_spte, u64 new_spte, u64 bit_mask)
+{
+	return (old_spte & bit_mask) && !(new_spte & bit_mask);
+}
+
+static bool spte_has_volatile_bits(u64 spte, u64 keep_bits)
 {
+	bool access_nonvolatile = false, dirty_nonvolatile = false;
+
 	if (!shadow_accessed_mask)
 		return false;
 
-	if (!is_shadow_present_pte(spte))
-		return false;
+	if ((spte | keep_bits) & shadow_accessed_mask)
+		access_nonvolatile = true;
+
+	if (!is_writable_pte(spte) || ((spte | keep_bits) & shadow_dirty_mask))
+		dirty_nonvolatile = true;
 
-	if ((spte & shadow_accessed_mask) &&
-	      (!is_writable_pte(spte) || (spte & shadow_dirty_mask)))
+	if (access_nonvolatile && dirty_nonvolatile)
 		return false;
 
 	return true;
 }
 
-static bool spte_is_bit_cleared(u64 old_spte, u64 new_spte, u64 bit_mask)
+static void track_spte_bits(u64 old_spte, u64 keep_bits, bool always_track)
 {
-	return (old_spte & bit_mask) && !(new_spte & bit_mask);
+	if (always_track ||
+	      (spte_is_bit_cleared(old_spte, keep_bits, shadow_accessed_mask)))
+		kvm_set_pfn_accessed(spte_to_pfn(old_spte));
+
+	if (always_track ||
+	      (spte_is_bit_cleared(old_spte, keep_bits, shadow_dirty_mask)))
+		kvm_set_pfn_dirty(spte_to_pfn(old_spte));
+}
+
+static u64 spte_get_and_update_clear(u64 *sptep, u64 new_spte)
+{
+	u64 old_spte = *sptep;
+
+	if (!spte_has_volatile_bits(old_spte, new_spte))
+		__set_spte(sptep, new_spte);
+	else
+		old_spte = __xchg_spte(sptep, new_spte);
+
+	return old_spte;
 }
 
 /* Rules for using mmu_spte_set:
@@ -316,7 +343,7 @@ static void mmu_spte_set(u64 *sptep, u64 new_spte)
  */
 static void mmu_spte_update(u64 *sptep, u64 new_spte)
 {
-	u64 mask, old_spte = *sptep;
+	u64 old_spte = *sptep;
 
 	WARN_ON(!is_rmap_spte(new_spte));
 
@@ -324,23 +351,8 @@ static void mmu_spte_update(u64 *sptep, u64 new_spte)
 		return mmu_spte_set(sptep, new_spte);
 
 	new_spte |= old_spte & shadow_dirty_mask;
-
-	mask = shadow_accessed_mask;
-	if (is_writable_pte(old_spte))
-		mask |= shadow_dirty_mask;
-
-	if (!spte_has_volatile_bits(old_spte) || (new_spte & mask) == mask)
-		__set_spte(sptep, new_spte);
-	else
-		old_spte = __xchg_spte(sptep, new_spte);
-
-	if (!shadow_accessed_mask)
-		return;
-
-	if (spte_is_bit_cleared(old_spte, new_spte, shadow_accessed_mask))
-		kvm_set_pfn_accessed(spte_to_pfn(old_spte));
-	if (spte_is_bit_cleared(old_spte, new_spte, shadow_dirty_mask))
-		kvm_set_pfn_dirty(spte_to_pfn(old_spte));
+	old_spte = spte_get_and_update_clear(sptep, new_spte);
+	track_spte_bits(old_spte, new_spte, false);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -350,22 +362,13 @@ static void mmu_spte_update(u64 *sptep, u64 new_spte)
  */
 static int mmu_spte_clear_track_bits(u64 *sptep)
 {
-	pfn_t pfn;
 	u64 old_spte = *sptep;
 
-	if (!spte_has_volatile_bits(old_spte))
-		__set_spte(sptep, 0ull);
-	else
-		old_spte = __xchg_spte(sptep, 0ull);
-
 	if (!is_rmap_spte(old_spte))
 		return 0;
 
-	pfn = spte_to_pfn(old_spte);
-	if (!shadow_accessed_mask || old_spte & shadow_accessed_mask)
-		kvm_set_pfn_accessed(pfn);
-	if (!shadow_dirty_mask || (old_spte & shadow_dirty_mask))
-		kvm_set_pfn_dirty(pfn);
+	old_spte = spte_get_and_update_clear(sptep, 0ull);
+	track_spte_bits(old_spte, 0ull, !shadow_accessed_mask);
 	return 1;
 }
 
-- 
1.7.5.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-06-30  8:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-30  8:19 [PATCH v3 01/19] KVM: MMU: fix walking shadow page table Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30  8:19 ` [PATCH v3 02/19] KVM: MMU: do not update slot bitmap if spte is nonpresent Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 03/19] KVM: x86: introduce vcpu_mmio_gva_to_gpa to cleanup the code Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 04/19] KVM: MMU: cache mmio info on page fault path Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-05 19:04   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-07-06  1:17     ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30  8:21 ` [PATCH v3 05/19] KVM: MMU: optimize to handle dirty bit Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-05 19:27   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-07-06  1:22     ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-06 16:51       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-07-06 19:12         ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-07  8:15           ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-06-30  8:21 ` [PATCH v3 06/19] KVM: MMU: cleanup for FNAME(fetch) Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30  8:22 ` [PATCH v3 07/19] KVM: MMU: rename 'pt_write' to 'emulate' Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30  8:22 ` [PATCH v3 08/19] KVM: MMU: count used shadow pages on prepareing path Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30  8:23 ` [PATCH v3 09/19] KVM: MMU: split kvm_mmu_free_page Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30  8:23 ` [PATCH v3 10/19] KVM: MMU: remove bypass_guest_pf Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30  8:24 ` [PATCH v3 11/19] KVM: MMU: filter out the mmio pfn from the fault pfn Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-06 17:17   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-07-06 19:13     ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30  8:24 ` [PATCH v3 12/19] KVM: MMU: abstract some functions to handle " Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30  8:25 ` [PATCH v3 13/19] KVM: MMU: introduce the rules to modify shadow page table Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30  8:25 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2011-07-06 17:39   ` [PATCH v3 14/19] KVM: MMU: clean up spte updating and clearing Marcelo Tosatti
2011-07-06 19:18     ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-07  8:16       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-07-07  9:30         ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30  8:26 ` [PATCH v3 15/19] KVM: MMU: do not need atomicly to set/clear spte Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30  8:26 ` [PATCH v3 16/19] KVM: MMU: lockless walking shadow page table Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-06 18:08   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-07-06 19:26     ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-07  8:18       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-06-30  8:26 ` [PATCH v3 17/19] KVM: MMU: reorganize struct kvm_shadow_walk_iterator Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30  8:27 ` [PATCH v3 18/19] KVM: MMU: mmio page fault support Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-06 18:52   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-07-06 19:59     ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-07  8:49       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-06-30  8:28 ` [PATCH v3 19/19] KVM: MMU: trace mmio page fault Xiao Guangrong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E0C32FE.2020805@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox