From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 15/19] KVM: MMU: do not need atomicly to set/clear spte
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 16:26:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E0C331A.8050204@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E0C3178.2080603@cn.fujitsu.com>
Now, the spte is just from nonprsent to present or present to nonprsent, so
we can use some trick to set/clear spte non-atomicly as linux kernel does
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index 857d0d6..06c3a4a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -259,26 +259,82 @@ static gfn_t pse36_gfn_delta(u32 gpte)
return (gpte & PT32_DIR_PSE36_MASK) << shift;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
static void __set_spte(u64 *sptep, u64 spte)
{
- set_64bit(sptep, spte);
+ *sptep = spte;
}
-static u64 __xchg_spte(u64 *sptep, u64 new_spte)
+static void __update_clear_spte_fast(u64 *sptep, u64 spte)
{
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
- return xchg(sptep, new_spte);
+ *sptep = spte;
+}
+
+static u64 __update_clear_spte_slow(u64 *sptep, u64 spte)
+{
+ return xchg(sptep, spte);
+}
#else
- u64 old_spte;
+union split_spte {
+ struct {
+ u32 spte_low;
+ u32 spte_high;
+ };
+ u64 spte;
+};
- do {
- old_spte = *sptep;
- } while (cmpxchg64(sptep, old_spte, new_spte) != old_spte);
+static void __set_spte(u64 *sptep, u64 spte)
+{
+ union split_spte *ssptep, sspte;
- return old_spte;
-#endif
+ ssptep = (union split_spte *)sptep;
+ sspte = (union split_spte)spte;
+
+ ssptep->spte_high = sspte.spte_high;
+
+ /*
+ * If we map the spte from nonpresent to present, We should store
+ * the high bits firstly, then set present bit, so cpu can not
+ * fetch this spte while we are setting the spte.
+ */
+ smp_wmb();
+
+ ssptep->spte_low = sspte.spte_low;
}
+static void __update_clear_spte_fast(u64 *sptep, u64 spte)
+{
+ union split_spte *ssptep, sspte;
+
+ ssptep = (union split_spte *)sptep;
+ sspte = (union split_spte)spte;
+
+ ssptep->spte_low = sspte.spte_low;
+
+ /*
+ * If we map the spte from present to nonpresent, we should clear
+ * present bit firstly to avoid vcpu fetch the old high bits.
+ */
+ smp_wmb();
+
+ ssptep->spte_high = sspte.spte_high;
+}
+
+static u64 __update_clear_spte_slow(u64 *sptep, u64 spte)
+{
+ union split_spte *ssptep, sspte, orig;
+
+ ssptep = (union split_spte *)sptep;
+ sspte = (union split_spte)spte;
+
+ /* xchg acts as a barrier before the setting of the high bits */
+ orig.spte_low = xchg(&ssptep->spte_low, sspte.spte_low);
+ orig.spte_high = ssptep->spte_high = sspte.spte_high;
+
+ return orig.spte;
+}
+#endif
+
static bool spte_is_bit_cleared(u64 old_spte, u64 new_spte, u64 bit_mask)
{
return (old_spte & bit_mask) && !(new_spte & bit_mask);
@@ -319,9 +375,9 @@ static u64 spte_get_and_update_clear(u64 *sptep, u64 new_spte)
u64 old_spte = *sptep;
if (!spte_has_volatile_bits(old_spte, new_spte))
- __set_spte(sptep, new_spte);
+ __update_clear_spte_fast(sptep, new_spte);
else
- old_spte = __xchg_spte(sptep, new_spte);
+ old_spte = __update_clear_spte_slow(sptep, new_spte);
return old_spte;
}
@@ -379,7 +435,7 @@ static int mmu_spte_clear_track_bits(u64 *sptep)
*/
static void mmu_spte_clear_no_track(u64 *sptep)
{
- __set_spte(sptep, 0ull);
+ __update_clear_spte_fast(sptep, 0ull);
}
static int mmu_topup_memory_cache(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache,
--
1.7.5.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-30 8:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-30 8:19 [PATCH v3 01/19] KVM: MMU: fix walking shadow page table Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30 8:19 ` [PATCH v3 02/19] KVM: MMU: do not update slot bitmap if spte is nonpresent Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30 8:20 ` [PATCH v3 03/19] KVM: x86: introduce vcpu_mmio_gva_to_gpa to cleanup the code Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30 8:20 ` [PATCH v3 04/19] KVM: MMU: cache mmio info on page fault path Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-05 19:04 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-07-06 1:17 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30 8:21 ` [PATCH v3 05/19] KVM: MMU: optimize to handle dirty bit Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-05 19:27 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-07-06 1:22 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-06 16:51 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-07-06 19:12 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-07 8:15 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-06-30 8:21 ` [PATCH v3 06/19] KVM: MMU: cleanup for FNAME(fetch) Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30 8:22 ` [PATCH v3 07/19] KVM: MMU: rename 'pt_write' to 'emulate' Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30 8:22 ` [PATCH v3 08/19] KVM: MMU: count used shadow pages on prepareing path Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30 8:23 ` [PATCH v3 09/19] KVM: MMU: split kvm_mmu_free_page Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30 8:23 ` [PATCH v3 10/19] KVM: MMU: remove bypass_guest_pf Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30 8:24 ` [PATCH v3 11/19] KVM: MMU: filter out the mmio pfn from the fault pfn Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-06 17:17 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-07-06 19:13 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30 8:24 ` [PATCH v3 12/19] KVM: MMU: abstract some functions to handle " Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30 8:25 ` [PATCH v3 13/19] KVM: MMU: introduce the rules to modify shadow page table Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30 8:25 ` [PATCH v3 14/19] KVM: MMU: clean up spte updating and clearing Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-06 17:39 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-07-06 19:18 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-07 8:16 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-07-07 9:30 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30 8:26 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2011-06-30 8:26 ` [PATCH v3 16/19] KVM: MMU: lockless walking shadow page table Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-06 18:08 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-07-06 19:26 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-07 8:18 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-06-30 8:26 ` [PATCH v3 17/19] KVM: MMU: reorganize struct kvm_shadow_walk_iterator Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30 8:27 ` [PATCH v3 18/19] KVM: MMU: mmio page fault support Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-06 18:52 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-07-06 19:59 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-07 8:49 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-06-30 8:28 ` [PATCH v3 19/19] KVM: MMU: trace mmio page fault Xiao Guangrong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E0C331A.8050204@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox