public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>,
	Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
	Nick Bowler <nbowler@elliptictech.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
	Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
Subject: Re: {PATCH] fix __packed in exported kernel headers
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:02:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E0CD64D.406@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=dGPz4MpSKUNWaA_W1t4C_+zV=0w@mail.gmail.com>

On 06/30/2011 12:13 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>
>> Not unless the kernel uses its own namespace for these defines.  The
>> thing is, most libraries have their own macro library for this, and
>> collisions are both likely and bad.
> 
> while that's true for exporting compiler.h, namespacing is irrelevant
> to my requirement -- the headers should have sane/usable defaults.
> 

I have no idea what "your requirements" are, but as someone who has
actually implemented a C library on top of the Linux headers I can tell
you it's a very real and relevant issue, and that it is historically one
of the biggest problems.

	-hpa

  reply	other threads:[~2011-06-30 20:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-22  6:34 __packed vs. __attribute__((packed)) in kernel headers Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-06-23 13:42 ` Nick Bowler
2011-06-23 15:02   ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-06-23 16:57     ` Joe Perches
2011-06-24 13:07       ` Michal Marek
2011-06-24 13:51         ` {PATCH] fix __packed in exported " Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-06-24 15:17           ` Michal Marek
2011-06-24 16:33           ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-06-24 17:00             ` Mike Frysinger
2011-06-30 18:26               ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-30 18:48                 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-06-30 18:52                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-30 18:58                     ` Mike Frysinger
2011-06-30 19:01                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-30 19:13                         ` Mike Frysinger
2011-06-30 20:02                           ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2011-06-30 21:56                             ` Mike Frysinger
2011-06-24 17:01             ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-06-23 17:04 ` __packed vs. __attribute__((packed)) in " richard -rw- weinberger
2011-06-23 17:46   ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-06-23 17:54 ` Mike Frysinger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E0CD64D.406@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=markus@trippelsdorf.de \
    --cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
    --cc=nbowler@elliptictech.com \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=vapier@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox