From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756146Ab1GAUeP (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jul 2011 16:34:15 -0400 Received: from 0122700014.0.fullrate.dk ([95.166.99.235]:36763 "EHLO kernel.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751929Ab1GAUeO (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jul 2011 16:34:14 -0400 Message-ID: <4E0E2F43.8040202@kernel.dk> Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 22:34:11 +0200 From: Jens Axboe MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Arnd Bergmann CC: Johannes Stezenbach , Kevin Wolf , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Viro Subject: Re: [PATCH resend] compat_ioctl: fix warning caused by qemu References: <20110701093336.GA9582@sig21.net> <201107011646.28918.arnd@arndb.de> In-Reply-To: <201107011646.28918.arnd@arndb.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2011-07-01 16:46, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > Yes, that should be fine, unless Jens would like to see a different > solution for the struct definitions, e.g. moving all of the floppy > compat ioctl numbers to fd.h. I'm fine with it either way. Looks OK to me, I've queued it up for 3.1 with your ack. Thanks Johannes. -- Jens Axboe