public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/19] KVM: MMU: optimize to handle dirty bit
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 09:22:28 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E13B8D4.3050704@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110705192703.GB24417@amt.cnet>

On 07/06/2011 03:27 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 04:21:30PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>> If dirty bit is not set, we can make the pte access read-only to avoid handing
>> dirty bit everywhere
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
> 
>> -static unsigned FNAME(gpte_access)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, pt_element_t gpte)
>> +static unsigned FNAME(gpte_access)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, pt_element_t gpte,
>> +				   bool last)
>>  {
>>  	unsigned access;
>>  
>>  	access = (gpte & (PT_WRITABLE_MASK | PT_USER_MASK)) | ACC_EXEC_MASK;
>> +	if (last && !is_dirty_gpte(gpte))
>> +		access &= ~ACC_WRITE_MASK;
>> +
> 
> What if the walker marks the dirty bit on the gpte?
> 

Actually, we get guest pte access after mark the dirty bit:

	if (write_fault && unlikely(!is_dirty_gpte(pte))) {
		int ret;

		trace_kvm_mmu_set_dirty_bit(table_gfn, index, sizeof(pte));
		ret = FNAME(cmpxchg_gpte)(vcpu, mmu, ptep_user, index,
					  pte, pte|PT_DIRTY_MASK);
		if (unlikely(ret < 0)) {
			present = false;
			goto error;
		} else if (ret)
			goto walk;

		mark_page_dirty(vcpu->kvm, table_gfn);
		pte |= PT_DIRTY_MASK;
		walker->ptes[walker->level - 1] = pte;
	}

	pte_access = pt_access & FNAME(gpte_access)(vcpu, pte, true);
 
So, i think it works well :-)

  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-06  1:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-30  8:19 [PATCH v3 01/19] KVM: MMU: fix walking shadow page table Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30  8:19 ` [PATCH v3 02/19] KVM: MMU: do not update slot bitmap if spte is nonpresent Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 03/19] KVM: x86: introduce vcpu_mmio_gva_to_gpa to cleanup the code Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 04/19] KVM: MMU: cache mmio info on page fault path Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-05 19:04   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-07-06  1:17     ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30  8:21 ` [PATCH v3 05/19] KVM: MMU: optimize to handle dirty bit Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-05 19:27   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-07-06  1:22     ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2011-07-06 16:51       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-07-06 19:12         ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-07  8:15           ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-06-30  8:21 ` [PATCH v3 06/19] KVM: MMU: cleanup for FNAME(fetch) Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30  8:22 ` [PATCH v3 07/19] KVM: MMU: rename 'pt_write' to 'emulate' Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30  8:22 ` [PATCH v3 08/19] KVM: MMU: count used shadow pages on prepareing path Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30  8:23 ` [PATCH v3 09/19] KVM: MMU: split kvm_mmu_free_page Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30  8:23 ` [PATCH v3 10/19] KVM: MMU: remove bypass_guest_pf Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30  8:24 ` [PATCH v3 11/19] KVM: MMU: filter out the mmio pfn from the fault pfn Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-06 17:17   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-07-06 19:13     ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30  8:24 ` [PATCH v3 12/19] KVM: MMU: abstract some functions to handle " Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30  8:25 ` [PATCH v3 13/19] KVM: MMU: introduce the rules to modify shadow page table Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30  8:25 ` [PATCH v3 14/19] KVM: MMU: clean up spte updating and clearing Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-06 17:39   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-07-06 19:18     ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-07  8:16       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-07-07  9:30         ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30  8:26 ` [PATCH v3 15/19] KVM: MMU: do not need atomicly to set/clear spte Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30  8:26 ` [PATCH v3 16/19] KVM: MMU: lockless walking shadow page table Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-06 18:08   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-07-06 19:26     ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-07  8:18       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-06-30  8:26 ` [PATCH v3 17/19] KVM: MMU: reorganize struct kvm_shadow_walk_iterator Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-30  8:27 ` [PATCH v3 18/19] KVM: MMU: mmio page fault support Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-06 18:52   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-07-06 19:59     ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-07  8:49       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-06-30  8:28 ` [PATCH v3 19/19] KVM: MMU: trace mmio page fault Xiao Guangrong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E13B8D4.3050704@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox