From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: David Sharp <dhsharp@google.com>,
Vaibhav Nagarnaik <vnagarnaik@google.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com>,
x86@kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jiaying Zhang <jiayingz@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] trace: Add x86 irq vector entry/exit tracepoints
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 17:02:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E14F797.8070501@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110706235613.GA21115@somewhere>
On 07/06/2011 04:56 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> And even if tracepoints are not supposed to be stable ABI (I actually believe there
> is no absolute answer to that, it depends on the tracepoint and on the context),
> tools are much happier with a common tracepoint interface amongst archs.
What you're suggesting here is an ad hoc ABI. This is insanely
irresponsible -- ABIs need to be designed, not randomly appeared.
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-07 0:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-22 22:56 [PATCH] trace: Add special x86 irq entry/exit tracepoints Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2011-04-25 23:41 ` Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2011-04-28 23:16 ` Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2011-04-28 23:41 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-04-29 20:12 ` [PATCH] trace: Add x86 irq vector " Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2011-04-29 20:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-04-29 22:04 ` Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2011-05-31 21:28 ` [PATCH v2] " Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2011-06-01 0:00 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-06-01 22:38 ` Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2011-06-01 23:30 ` David Sharp
2011-06-16 3:02 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-06-21 18:43 ` Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2011-07-06 23:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-06 23:56 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-07 0:02 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2011-07-07 0:25 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-07 0:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-07 0:51 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-07 9:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-07 22:50 ` David Sharp
2011-07-07 23:00 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-06-21 18:45 ` [PATCH v3] " Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2011-07-06 21:50 ` Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2011-07-06 23:38 ` Andi Kleen
2011-07-07 23:34 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-08 0:54 ` David Sharp
2011-07-11 15:54 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-11 18:21 ` Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2011-07-12 18:09 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-12 22:08 ` Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2011-07-13 14:11 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-13 18:18 ` Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2011-04-29 0:14 ` [PATCH] trace: Add special x86 irq " Thomas Gleixner
2011-04-29 20:15 ` Vaibhav Nagarnaik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E14F797.8070501@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=dhsharp@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jiayingz@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mrubin@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vnagarnaik@google.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox