From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752527Ab1GIIm6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Jul 2011 04:42:58 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:58937 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751886Ab1GIIm5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Jul 2011 04:42:57 -0400 Message-ID: <4E181477.5090405@zytor.com> Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 01:42:31 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc15 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tejun Heo CC: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Conny Seidel , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hans Rosenfeld Subject: Re: [PATCH x86/urgent 2/2] x86: Implement pfn -> nid mapping granularity check References: <20110621174131.054f0422.conny.seidel_amd.com@marah.osrc.amd.com> <20110626102235.GC12200@mtj.dyndns.org> <20110626223807.47cef5c6.conny.seidel_amd.com@marah.osrc.amd.com> <20110628174613.GP478@escobedo.osrc.amd.com> <20110629094451.GJ3386@htj.dyndns.org> <20110701162239.GX3386@htj.dyndns.org> <20110701162327.GY3386@htj.dyndns.org> <20110709083206.GB943@htj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20110709083206.GB943@htj.dyndns.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/09/2011 01:32 AM, Tejun Heo wrote: > > Ping? If the change is too invasive at this stage, we can disable AMD > NUMA on x86_32 for 3.0 and queue these two for 3.1. > I am kind of leaning that way... Hans, what is your opinion? -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.