From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756157Ab1GJRDp (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jul 2011 13:03:45 -0400 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:48724 "HELO mailout-de.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1755897Ab1GJRDl (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jul 2011 13:03:41 -0400 X-Authenticated: #12510340 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+tr/gZht6tf4s3UP/N0f0ozBVyz6KtVUwbxyl5+A x5HKHxkEeE8SjA Message-ID: <4E19DB69.5020406@gmx.net> Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 19:03:37 +0200 From: Olaf Freyer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110705 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Maciej Rutecki , Florian Mickler Subject: Re: [Bug #36182] Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This issue is still worth listing, as it isn't resolved yet. Jesse Barnes already tracked down the cause to commit ccab5c82759e2ace74b2e84f82d1e0eedd932571 - but what to do now remains unclear to me. With the patch reverted, I get down to 1 warning per workday - without reverting it I'm at 70-90k warnings per workday. Am 10.07.2011 12:58, schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.38 and 2.6.39. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.38 and 2.6.39. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 > Subject : Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39 > Submitter : Olaf Freyer > Date : 2011-05-22 13:01 (50 days old) > Message-ID : <4DD9092A.4080507@gmx.net> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=130606930631131&w=2 > > >