From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757404Ab1GKTWY (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jul 2011 15:22:24 -0400 Received: from smtpo.poczta.interia.pl ([217.74.65.206]:48312 "EHLO smtpo.poczta.interia.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754114Ab1GKTWX (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jul 2011 15:22:23 -0400 Message-ID: <4E1B4D5C.7090301@interia.pl> Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 20:22:04 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?b?UmFmYcWC?= Bilski User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110628 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Harald Welte , LKLM Subject: CPUFREQ: Mark e_powersaver driver as EXPERIMENTAL and DANGEROUS X-Interia-Antivirus: OK X-EMID: 9c77f958 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello! Sorry for late reply. I've been aware problem with "e_powersaver". Nobody ever e-mailed me :-) So far I'm aware "e_powersaver" fully respects values given it by CPU. Only code added by VIA seems to be faulty for me. As I understand ACPI P-States provide unstable 400MHz for system in question too. If "e_powersaver" was based on outdated documentation I'm sorry. This driver was neccessary for systems with C7 CPU's which didn't provide BIOS P-states. But it was in early and dark ages of first C7 CPU's. Bye ---------------------------------------------------------------- Najwieksza baza samochodow nowych i uzywanych Sprawdz >> http://linkint.pl/f29e3