* CPUFREQ: Mark e_powersaver driver as EXPERIMENTAL and DANGEROUS
@ 2011-07-11 19:22 Rafał Bilski
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Rafał Bilski @ 2011-07-11 19:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Harald Welte, LKLM
Hello!
Sorry for late reply. I've been aware problem with "e_powersaver".
Nobody ever e-mailed me :-)
So far I'm aware "e_powersaver" fully respects values given it by CPU.
Only code added by VIA
seems to be faulty for me. As I understand ACPI P-States provide
unstable 400MHz for system in question too.
If "e_powersaver" was based on outdated documentation I'm sorry. This
driver was neccessary for systems with
C7 CPU's which didn't provide BIOS P-states. But it was in early and
dark ages of first C7 CPU's.
Bye
----------------------------------------------------------------
Najwieksza baza samochodow nowych i uzywanych
Sprawdz >> http://linkint.pl/f29e3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2011-07-11 19:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-07-11 19:22 CPUFREQ: Mark e_powersaver driver as EXPERIMENTAL and DANGEROUS Rafał Bilski
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox