From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"acme@ghostprotocols.net" <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] perf: add context field to perf_event
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 12:27:15 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E1C1373.5080500@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1310462335.14978.12.camel@twins>
On 07/12/2011 12:18 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > The guarantee is that the task was sleeping just before the function is
> > called. Of course it's woken up to run the function.
> >
> > The idea is that you run the function in a known safe point to avoid
> > extra synchronization.
> >
>
> I'd much rather we didn't wake the task and let it sleep, that's usually
> a very safe place for tasks to be. All you'd need is a guarantee it
> won't be woken up while you're doing your thing.
But it means that 'current' is not set to the right value. If the
function depends on it, then it will misbehave. And in fact
preempt_notifier_register(), which is the function we want to call here,
does depend on current.
Of course we need to find more users for this, but I have a feeling this
will be generally useful. The alternative is to keep adding bits to
thread_info::flags.
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-12 9:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-29 15:42 [PATCH 0/3] Preparatory perf patches for KVM PMU support Avi Kivity
2011-06-29 15:42 ` [PATCH 1/3] perf: add context field to perf_event Avi Kivity
2011-06-29 16:08 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-06-29 16:25 ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-29 16:27 ` Will Deacon
2011-07-04 13:58 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-04 14:10 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-04 14:36 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-11 21:07 ` Will Deacon
2011-07-12 7:20 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-12 8:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-12 9:08 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-12 9:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-12 9:16 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-12 9:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-12 9:27 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2011-07-12 9:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-12 9:36 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-12 9:42 ` Will Deacon
2011-07-12 9:41 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-07-12 9:44 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-12 9:48 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-07-12 9:55 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-12 10:03 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-07-12 10:07 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-12 10:24 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-07-12 10:36 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-21 15:32 ` Will Deacon
2011-07-21 15:36 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-21 15:46 ` Will Deacon
2011-07-21 15:59 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-21 16:37 ` Will Deacon
2011-07-05 14:30 ` Will Deacon
2011-07-05 14:34 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-01 15:24 ` [tip:perf/core] perf: Add " tip-bot for Avi Kivity
2011-06-29 15:42 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86, perf: add constraints for architectural PMU v1 Avi Kivity
2011-07-01 15:24 ` [tip:perf/core] x86, perf: Add constraints for architectural PMU tip-bot for Avi Kivity
2011-06-29 15:42 ` [PATCH 3/3] perf: export perf_event_refresh() to modules Avi Kivity
2011-07-01 15:25 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E1C1373.5080500@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox