Re: [PATCH 2/7] KVM: SVM: Use host_vmcb_pa for vmload and vmsave

[Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>]

On 07/13/2011 06:32 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> This saves copying over the vmload/vmsave switched part from
> the host to the guest vmcb later.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel<joerg.roedel@amd.com>
> ---
>   arch/x86/kvm/svm.c |    7 ++++++-
>   1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> index 3d5990f..dc703ac 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> @@ -3704,9 +3704,13 @@ static void svm_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
>   		/* Enter guest mode */
>   		"push %%"R"ax \n\t"
> -		"mov %c[vmcb](%[svm]), %%"R"ax \n\t"
> +		"mov %c[host_vmcb](%[svm]), %%"R"ax \n\t"
>   		__ex(SVM_VMLOAD) "\n\t"
> +		"mov (%%"R"sp), %%"R"ax\n\t"
> +		"mov %c[vmcb](%[svm]), %%"R"ax \n\t"
>   		__ex(SVM_VMRUN) "\n\t"
> +		"mov (%%"R"sp), %%"R"ax\n\t"
> +		"mov %c[host_vmcb](%[svm]), %%"R"ax \n\t"
>   		__ex(SVM_VMSAVE) "\n\t"
>   		"pop %%"R"ax \n\t"
>

Okay, so the plan is to split L2 state between ->vmcb and ->host_vmcb?  
In that case my suggestion for patch 1 doesn't apply.  But the name 
still is confusing.  If we don't find a better one, I want a fat comment 
explaining how state is split.

(would be good to have documentation for the overall strategy of nsvm, 
like we have for nvmx and nmmu).

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function