From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755002Ab1GNV0d (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jul 2011 17:26:33 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:57030 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754801Ab1GNV0c (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jul 2011 17:26:32 -0400 Message-ID: <4E1F5EF3.6050601@zytor.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 14:26:11 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc15 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Frederic Weisbecker CC: Ingo Molnar , LKML , Peter Zijlstra , Jason Wessel , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] x86: Allow the user not to build hw_breakpoints References: <1310655837-328-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <1310655837-328-4-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1310655837-328-4-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/14/2011 08:03 AM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > So that hw_breakpoints and perf can be not built on > specific embedded systems. I want to emphasize I am very, very unhappy about this. It should be possible to not build perf while still have breakpoints available... breakpoints are way more important than perf. -hpa