Re: [PATCH 0/1] Fixup write permission of TLB on powerpc e500 core

[Shan Hai <haishan.bai@gmail.com>]

On 07/15/2011 05:50 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 17:08 +0800, Shan Hai wrote:
>> The whole scenario should be,
>> - the child process triggers a page fault at the first time access to
>>       the lock, and it got its own writable page, but its *clean* for
>>       the reason just for checking the status of the lock.
>>       I am sorry for above "unbreakable COW".
>> - the futex_lock_pi() is invoked because of the lock contention,
>>       and the futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic() tries to get the lock,
>>       it found out the lock is free so tries to write to the lock for
>>       reservation, a page fault occurs, because the page is read only
>>       for kernel(e500 specific), and returns -EFAULT to the caller
>> - the fault_in_user_writeable() tries to fix the fault,
>>       but from the get_user_pages() view everything is ok, because
>>       the COW was already broken, retry futex_lock_pi_atomic()
> but that's a bug right there, gup(.write=1) _should_ be a complete write
> fault, and as such toggle your sw dirty/young tracking.
>

The fault causing futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic() is
protected by pagefault_disable(), so the page fault handler has
no chance to toggle the SW dirty/young tracking.

Thanks
Shan Hai

>> - futex_lock_pi_atomic() -->  futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic(),
>>       another write protection page fault
>> - infinite loop