public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Linda A. Walsh" <lvm@tlinx.org>
To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] mount's (&udev's) dirty little naming problem
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 13:46:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E25ED24.6020404@tlinx.org> (raw)



Luca Berra wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 12:57:21AM -0700, Linda A. Walsh wrote:
>>   (sorry for the length of this, in advance, but I've tried to give
>> this some though...(maybe not enough/maybe too much!) ;-) )
>>
>> Luca Berra wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 03:16:31AM +0100, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
>> >> The canonical name to use is /dev/<vgname>/<lvname>. ...
>> >>
>> >> [~Other forms - dm-N and /dev/mapper/X-Y are internal and ...
>> >> there'll probably be some further changes to workaround other
>> >> arbitrary   udev restrictions...~]
>> >>
>> >> Different versions of df and mount haven't always retained this
>> >> preferred form for their output.
>> >>
>> > note that on a freshly installed rhel 6.1 i have this in fstab
>> >
>> > /dev/mapper/vg_candela--lv_root / ext4 ....
>>
>> ---
>>
>>   Why are there two dashes between the VG&LG? 
> woops, typo, sorry for that  it is :
> /dev/mapper/vg_candela-lv_root / ext4 defaults 1 1
>
> L. 
------
   That's consistent with current behavior -- the problem is
in the current name mangling   (i,e. mounts by  "/dev/VG/LV"   get
xlated into   "/dev/mapper/<mangled-VG>-<mangled-LV>", where
at least one manglement is xlating "-" into "--".  But I've already been
told that future manglements may be added due to limitations in udev.

   For non LV devs, it would be like having  '/dev/sdc2'  xlated
into  '(hd2,<rand>)' (where <rand> = some not always consistent integer)
which, of course would be silly! ( ;-) ), or  xlating
LABEL="MyDisk-Label" =>  '/dev'disk/by-label/MYDISK--LABEL'
(with 'My-Label' being 'canonicalized', for some definition of thereof,
into some other value), vs. now, it's given the real devname
(/dev/sdc<x>) (which is FINE with me...; it's the real HW name that
the kernel uses, whereas 'label=xxx was a syntax I was encouraged
to use as part of the suse boot system, as 'everything works with labels'
(well, lets not speak about lilo, or booting from an HD w/o a ram disk,
as we'll just drop support for those options...*cough*)....

    As noted, the current behavior isn't giving/using either
the 'real devname' /dev/dm-[x], NOR the user name, but a mangled name 
making it the worst of all worlds, as there is no easy way to find
out the LV and VG of the device mounted on a given mount point.

    To get around this == and tell me if I'm wrong, I have to use
lvm, to output a list of all VG,LV groups.

Then using a [perl] script (I suppose BASH's Associative arrays might
work too, but familiarity points toward perl at this point), I can
build up an Assoc array to map devno's -> VG,LV, then use the devno
of the mountpoint as an index into that.

    That level of complexity is so completely LAME just to find out
the name I used to mount a FS on some mount point!.... 

    If there is an easier way, please, hit me with a clue stick!

-l


                 reply	other threads:[~2011-07-19 20:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E25ED24.6020404@tlinx.org \
    --to=lvm@tlinx.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox