From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"acme@ghostprotocols.net" <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] perf: add context field to perf_event
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 18:36:43 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E28478B.1070907@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110721153238.GC8446@e102144-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
On 07/21/2011 06:32 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> >
> > Using TIF_bits sounds like a much better solution for this, wakeups are
> > really rather expensive and its best to avoid extra if at all possible.
>
> The problem with using a TIF bit to tell a task that it needs to perform
> some preempt_notifier registrations is that you end up with something that
> looks a lot like preempt notifiers! You also don't escape the concurrent
> read/write to thelist of pending registrations.
>
> One thing I tried was simply using an RCU protected hlist for the preempt
> notifiers so that we don't have to worry about atomicity when reading the
> notifiers in finish_task_switch. It's a bit odd, since we know we only ever
> have a single reader, but I've included it below anyway.
>
> If anybody has any better ideas, I'm all ears.
> +void preempt_notifier_register_task(struct preempt_notifier *notifier,
> + struct task_struct *tsk)
> +{
> + mutex_lock(&tsk->preempt_notifiers_mutex);
> + hlist_add_head_rcu(¬ifier->link,&tsk->preempt_notifiers);
> + mutex_unlock(&tsk->preempt_notifiers_mutex);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(preempt_notifier_register_task);
> +
> +void preempt_notifier_unregister_task(struct preempt_notifier *notifier,
> + struct task_struct *tsk)
> +{
> + mutex_lock(&tsk->preempt_notifiers_mutex);
> + hlist_del_rcu(¬ifier->link);
> + mutex_unlock(&tsk->preempt_notifiers_mutex);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(preempt_notifier_unregister_task);
> +
> /**
> * preempt_notifier_register - tell me when current is being preempted& rescheduled
> * @notifier: notifier struct to register
> */
> void preempt_notifier_register(struct preempt_notifier *notifier)
> {
> - hlist_add_head(¬ifier->link,¤t->preempt_notifiers);
> + preempt_notifier_register_task(notifier, current);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(preempt_notifier_register);
This is (and must be) called from a preempt disabled context, no mutexes
around here.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-21 15:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-29 15:42 [PATCH 0/3] Preparatory perf patches for KVM PMU support Avi Kivity
2011-06-29 15:42 ` [PATCH 1/3] perf: add context field to perf_event Avi Kivity
2011-06-29 16:08 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-06-29 16:25 ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-29 16:27 ` Will Deacon
2011-07-04 13:58 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-04 14:10 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-04 14:36 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-11 21:07 ` Will Deacon
2011-07-12 7:20 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-12 8:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-12 9:08 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-12 9:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-12 9:16 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-12 9:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-12 9:27 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-12 9:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-12 9:36 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-12 9:42 ` Will Deacon
2011-07-12 9:41 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-07-12 9:44 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-12 9:48 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-07-12 9:55 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-12 10:03 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-07-12 10:07 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-12 10:24 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-07-12 10:36 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-21 15:32 ` Will Deacon
2011-07-21 15:36 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2011-07-21 15:46 ` Will Deacon
2011-07-21 15:59 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-21 16:37 ` Will Deacon
2011-07-05 14:30 ` Will Deacon
2011-07-05 14:34 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-01 15:24 ` [tip:perf/core] perf: Add " tip-bot for Avi Kivity
2011-06-29 15:42 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86, perf: add constraints for architectural PMU v1 Avi Kivity
2011-07-01 15:24 ` [tip:perf/core] x86, perf: Add constraints for architectural PMU tip-bot for Avi Kivity
2011-06-29 15:42 ` [PATCH 3/3] perf: export perf_event_refresh() to modules Avi Kivity
2011-07-01 15:25 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E28478B.1070907@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox