From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Andrew Lutomirski <luto@mit.edu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86 <x86@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] syscall calling convention, stts/clts, and xstate latency
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 10:42:15 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E2D1E57.1080404@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110724211526.GA6785@elte.hu>
On 07/25/2011 12:15 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > All of this makes me think that, at least on Sandy Bridge, lazy
> > xstate saving is a bad optimization -- if the cache is being nice,
> > save/restore is faster than twiddling the TS bit. And the cost of
> > the trap when TS is set blows everything else away.
>
> Interesting. Mind cooking up a delazying patch and measure it on
> native as well? KVM generally makes exceptions more expensive, so the
> effect of lazy exceptions might be less on native.
While this is true in general, kvm will trap #NM only after a host
context switch or an exit to host userspace. These are supposedly rare
so you won't see them a lot, especially in a benchmark scenario with
just one guest.
("host context switch" includes switching to the idle thread when the
guest executes HLT, something I tried to optimize in the past but it
proved too difficult for the gain)
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-25 7:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-24 21:07 [RFC] syscall calling convention, stts/clts, and xstate latency Andrew Lutomirski
2011-07-24 21:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-24 22:34 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-07-25 3:21 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-07-25 6:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-25 10:05 ` [PATCH 3.1?] x86: Remove useless stts/clts pair in __switch_to Andy Lutomirski
2011-07-25 11:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-25 13:04 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-07-25 14:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-25 6:38 ` [RFC] syscall calling convention, stts/clts, and xstate latency Ingo Molnar
2011-07-25 9:44 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-07-25 9:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-25 11:04 ` Hans Rosenfeld
2011-07-25 7:42 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2011-07-25 7:54 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E2D1E57.1080404@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@mit.edu \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox