From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753945Ab1GZX6E (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jul 2011 19:58:04 -0400 Received: from smtp2.Stanford.EDU ([171.67.219.82]:33378 "EHLO smtp.stanford.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751064Ab1GZX6C (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jul 2011 19:58:02 -0400 Message-ID: <4E2F5486.1080007@localhost> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 16:57:58 -0700 From: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110621 Fedora/3.1.11-1.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano CC: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Uwe_Kleine-K=F6nig?= , Thomas Gleixner , LKML , linux-rt-users Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.0-rt3 References: <4E2DF459.3030509@localhost> <20110726091310.GP16561@pengutronix.de> <4E2F5344.3030103@localhost> In-Reply-To: <4E2F5344.3030103@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/26/2011 04:52 PM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > On 07/26/2011 02:13 AM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 03:55:21PM -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: >>> On 07/24/2011 03:33 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >>>> Dear RT Folks, >>>> >>>> I'm pleased to announce the 3.0-rt3 release. >>> >>> Thanks!!... testing on a dual core laptop, fedora 15, 32 bit: >>> >>> [ 32.169727] BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_ENTRIES too low! >>> [ 32.169730] turning off the locking correctness validator. >>> >>> (where do I change this?) >> I'd guess you need to increase MAX_LOCKDEP_ENTRIES which is defined in >> kernel/lockdep_internals.h. >> >> BTW, I hit that, too. > > Thanks, I upped that to 32768 (16384) but on boot I got another > complaint about MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS so I changed MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_BITS > from 15 to 31 and, well, the kernel build complains about "size of array > 'local_chains' is too large" (chain_hlocks as well) and does not build... > > Oh well... (I meant to myself - of COURSE, _think_ before changing things and meditate about the implications of power mathematical operations). :-) -- Fernando