From: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <m.b.lankhorst@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.0-rt3 (futex_requeue bad spinlock magic)
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 01:25:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E2FCB6E.4030307@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E2F70A6.6070008@linux.intel.com>
On 07/26/2011 06:57 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
>
>
> On 07/26/2011 10:11 AM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> On 07/26/2011 07:01 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
>>>
>>> On 07/26/2011 04:44 AM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>>>> On 07/26/2011 08:00 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
>>>>> On 07/25/2011 03:20 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
>>>>>> On 07/24/2011 09:12 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, 24 Jul 2011, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Also not sure where this one came from:
>>>>>>>> [ 37.456688] BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#3, threaded-ml/1619
>>>>>>>> [ 37.456690] lock: ffff8801fdc74d50, .magic: 00000000, .owner: <none>/-1, .owner_cpu: 0
>>>>>>>> [ 37.456692] Pid: 1619, comm: threaded-ml Tainted: G C 3.0.0-rt3-patser+ #39
>>> Maarten, I'm finding fairly little out there on what threaded-ml might
>>> be. What I do find suggests 3D visualization and real-time audio
>>> playback. Are you working with something like this? If so, which
>>> libraries are you using? If not, any idea what this is?
>> threaded ml = from pulseaudio,
>> src/pulse/thread-mainloop.c to be exact. But like I said it occurs with the functional broadcast test too, on the waker thread.
>>>>>>>> [ 37.456693] Call Trace:
>>>>>>>> [ 37.456697] [<ffffffff81607a78>] spin_bug+0xa0/0xa8
>>>>>>>> [ 37.456699] [<ffffffff8132b412>] do_raw_spin_lock+0xa2/0x170
>>>>>>>> [ 37.456702] [<ffffffff8104a201>] ? get_parent_ip+0x11/0x50
>>>>>>>> [ 37.456704] [<ffffffff8160d783>] _raw_spin_lock+0x23/0x30
>>>>>>>> [ 37.456706] [<ffffffff810931ce>] rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock+0x2e/0xd0
>>>>>>>> [ 37.456708] [<ffffffff8109093a>] futex_requeue+0x47a/0x850
>>>>>>>> [ 37.456710] [<ffffffff8109138e>] do_futex+0xae/0xb00
>>> Maarten, could you provide the addr2line of the addresses from do_futex
>>> to spin_bug ? This will help me trace the path.
>> decodes to:
>> linux/lib/spinlock_debug.c:72
>> linux/lib/spinlock_debug.c:79
>> linux/kernel/sched.c:4114
>> linux/kernel/spinlock.c:141
>> linux/kernel/rtmutex.c:100
>> linux/kernel/futex.c:1378
>> linux/kernel/futex.c:2662
>
>
> OK, so we're entering with a FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE op (not FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI),
> and land inside an "if (requeue_pi)" block in the futex_requeue() function -
> that should never happen. The interesting thing about this is pulse is only
> using the non PI pthread_cond calls, and thus FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE,
> (http://gitorious.org/~elmarco/pulseaudio/pa-work/blobs/1ca76031092ab07682843fd70607696f6af7216f/src/pulsecore/mutex-posix.c). I have not been able reproduce this path.
>
> My best guess at the moment is that we are somehow stomping on the requeue_pi
> value causing the waker to enter the wrong code paths. A simple test would be to
> print the value of requeue_pi throughout futex_requeue() and see if it changes
> (it shouldn't) and if it is something other than 0 or 1 (which it should never
> be). Are you able to reliably reproduce the pulse audio failure?
>
> The futex_requeue_pi test is of course using FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI, and it will
> reproduce a similar path (except via the FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI demux path as it
> should be) on the first time run, as Maarten observed. I have seen this with
> and without the -b (broadcast) option to the test.
>
> I was able to reproduce this on my system by adding the following to my config:
> +CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES=y
> +CONFIG_DEBUG_PI_LIST=y
> +CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK=y
>
> With a similar config, this does not occur on 2.6.33.9-rt31. Nothing jumps out
> as obviously wrong in the futex delta from 33-rt to now.
>
> I tried with 3.0.0 (non rt) with a similar .config and the problem is not
> reproducible. I'll continue to try and isolate the problem, focusing mainly on
> the futex delta from 3.0.0. Right after I get the kids to bed...
I believe this is now fixed with:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/7/27/74
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-27 8:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-24 10:33 [ANNOUNCE] 3.0-rt3 Thomas Gleixner
2011-07-24 14:40 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2011-07-24 16:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-07-24 16:42 ` hermann
2011-07-24 16:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-07-24 16:53 ` hermann
2011-07-24 17:23 ` Georgiewskiy Yuriy
2011-07-25 22:20 ` Darren Hart
2011-07-26 6:00 ` Darren Hart
2011-07-26 11:44 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2011-07-26 17:01 ` Darren Hart
2011-07-26 17:11 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2011-07-27 1:57 ` [ANNOUNCE] 3.0-rt3 (futex_requeue bad spinlock magic) Darren Hart
2011-07-27 8:25 ` Darren Hart [this message]
2011-07-26 9:01 ` [ANNOUNCE] 3.0-rt3 Thomas Gleixner
2011-07-25 22:55 ` Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
2011-07-26 9:13 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-07-26 23:52 ` Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
2011-07-26 23:57 ` Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
2011-07-26 3:11 ` Frank Rowand
2011-07-26 9:30 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-07-26 3:12 ` Frank Rowand
2011-07-26 9:19 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-07-26 9:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-07-26 3:14 ` Frank Rowand
2011-07-26 3:49 ` Darren Hart
2011-07-26 6:20 ` Yong Zhang
2011-07-27 18:05 ` N, Mugunthan V
2011-07-27 18:32 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E2FCB6E.4030307@linux.intel.com \
--to=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.b.lankhorst@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox