From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754733Ab1G0QGi (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:06:38 -0400 Received: from ch1ehsobe001.messaging.microsoft.com ([216.32.181.181]:15341 "EHLO ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754345Ab1G0QGg (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:06:36 -0400 X-SpamScore: -11 X-BigFish: VPS-11(zzbb2dK1432N98dKzz1202hzzz32i668h839h61h) X-Spam-TCS-SCL: 0:0 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:163.181.249.108;KIP:(null);UIP:(null);IPVD:NLI;H:ausb3twp01.amd.com;RD:none;EFVD:NLI X-WSS-ID: 0LP022T-01-4Q2-02 X-M-MSG: Message-ID: <4E303785.8000102@amd.com> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:06:29 -0400 From: Boris Ostrovsky User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 SUSE/3.1.11 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andi Kleen CC: Andi Kleen , "ostr@amd64.org" , "jvpeetz@web.de" , "Petkov, Borislav" , "mingo@elte.hu" , "gregkh@suse.de" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "stable@kernel.org" , "tim.bird@am.sony.com" , "stable@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] [25/98] x86, AMD: Fix APIC timer erratum 400 affecting K8 Rev.A-E processors References: <20110726534.972201586@firstfloor.org> <20110727003517.6946C2403FF@tassilo.jf.intel.com> <4E3006DF.6010906@amd.com> <20110727154203.GB16180@tassilo.jf.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20110727154203.GB16180@tassilo.jf.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginatorOrg: amd.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/27/11 11:42, Andi Kleen wrote: >> Andi, this patch is unnecessary. >> >> It (as well as 328935e6348c6a7cb34798a68c326f4b8372e68a and >> 14fb57dccb6e1defe9f89a66f548fcb24c374c1d) is superseded by >> e9cdd343a5e42c43bcda01e609fa23089e026470 upstream > > Is it obsolete in 2.6.35 too? Yes. > > So what should I do? Drop this one and merge some other? > Or just drop? Please drop it (and skip the other two that I mentioned above) and apply e9cdd343a5e42c43bcda01e609fa23089e026470. > > If yes why do the other ones not have Cc: stable marks? That was a mistake on my part, sorry about this. -boris