From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752998Ab1G3ViW (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Jul 2011 17:38:22 -0400 Received: from mta11.charter.net ([216.33.127.80]:53371 "EHLO mta11.charter.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752681Ab1G3ViQ (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Jul 2011 17:38:16 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 424 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 17:38:15 EDT X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=9p7SjTZeSDUoepfMOc4Nsety+m2Qz47GaesuhdPPf9o= c=1 sm=1 a=_PlU6wiDepAA:10 a=ouLsrW8xN78A:10 a=Q9fys5e9bTEA:10 a=xzrYXqw+0zwiO4gHSXHcAg==:17 a=2Q1i--T3G9GxwS85VTgA:9 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 a=xzrYXqw+0zwiO4gHSXHcAg==:117 Message-ID: <4E3479CC.7040403@cuw.edu> Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 16:38:20 -0500 From: Greg Dietsche User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20110702 Icedove/3.0.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Laurent Pinchart CC: mchehab@infradead.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, trivial@kernel.org, jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] uvcvideo: correct kernel version reference References: <201107302236.13354.laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> <4E347824.9080207@cuw.edu> <201107302334.38723.laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> In-Reply-To: <201107302334.38723.laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/30/2011 04:34 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Greg, > > On Saturday 30 July 2011 23:31:16 Greg Dietsche wrote: > >> On 07/30/2011 03:36 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: >> >>> Hi Greg, >>> >>> Thanks for the patch. >>> >>> On Saturday 30 July 2011 17:47:30 Greg Dietsche wrote: >>> >>>> change from v2.6.42 to v3.2 >>>> >>> This patch would be queued for v3.2. As the code it fixes will go away at >>> the same time, it would be pretty pointless to apply it :-) Thanks for >>> warning me though. >>> >> you're welcome - I thought the merge window was still open for 3.1 ... >> so that's why I sent it in. >> > Linus' merge window is still open, but this will have to go through Mauro's > tree, and it won't make it on time. > > Ah, that makes sense :) Anyway it is very trivial... thanks for the explanation! Greg