From: Maarten Lankhorst <m.b.lankhorst@gmail.com>
To: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] oprofile, x86: Move memory allocation for ppro out of per cpu
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 16:57:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E36BEE5.9060006@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110801070742.GA11795@erda.amd.com>
On 08/01/2011 09:07 AM, Robert Richter wrote:
> On 31.07.11 14:39:10, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> ppro_setup_ctrs is called on all cpu's, while init is only called once.
> Can you please describe the root problem more precisely. Why can't you
> run it on -rt? What is broken?
on -rt it warns about the allocation.
>> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <m.b.lankhorst@gmail.com>
>>
>> ---
>> Oprofile shutdown is still broken. Doing kfree in the shutdown call gave
> Do you mean it is broken and your patch fixes it, or is it still
> broken even with your path applied?
With the patch I no longer get the warning on setup_ctrs, but on rt
just starting and shutting down is enough to cause badness. The
original backtrace is below, but here's what happens with it patched.
opcontrol --start and then --shutdown:
[17318.720971] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/rtmutex.c:645
[17318.720972] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 18108, name: opjitconv
[17318.720974] Pid: 18108, comm: opjitconv Tainted: P WC 3.0.0-rt6-patser+ #5
[17318.720975] Call Trace:
[17318.720979] [<ffffffff8103fc0a>] __might_sleep+0xca/0xf0
[17318.720981] [<ffffffff8160d424>] rt_spin_lock+0x24/0x40
[17318.720983] [<ffffffff811453c3>] kfree+0xd3/0x370
[17318.720985] [<ffffffffa0c20204>] free_msrs+0x44/0x130 [oprofile]
[17318.720987] [<ffffffffa0c2037c>] nmi_shutdown+0x8c/0xc0 [oprofile]
[17318.720989] [<ffffffffa0c1d2b6>] oprofile_shutdown+0x36/0x70 [oprofile]
[17318.720990] [<ffffffffa0c1e8db>] event_buffer_release+0x1b/0x50 [oprofile]
[17318.720992] [<ffffffff8115814e>] fput+0xfe/0x240
[17318.720993] [<ffffffff811546ec>] filp_close+0x6c/0x90
[17318.720995] [<ffffffff8105a810>] put_files_struct+0xa0/0x120
[17318.720996] [<ffffffff8105a96c>] exit_files+0x5c/0x70
[17318.720997] [<ffffffff8105aeaf>] do_exit+0x17f/0x900
[17318.720998] [<ffffffff8105b9af>] do_group_exit+0x4f/0xd0
[17318.720999] [<ffffffff8105ba47>] sys_exit_group+0x17/0x20
[17318.721001] [<ffffffff8161456b>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[17318.721303] slab error in kmem_cache_destroy(): cache `dcookie_cache': Can't free all objects
[17318.721304] Pid: 18108, comm: opjitconv Tainted: P WC 3.0.0-rt6-patser+ #5
[17318.721305] Call Trace:
[17318.721306] [<ffffffff81145f4c>] kmem_cache_destroy+0xdc/0x120
[17318.721309] [<ffffffff811cd4e5>] dcookie_unregister+0x175/0x180
[17318.721310] [<ffffffffa0c1e8e7>] event_buffer_release+0x27/0x50 [oprofile]
[17318.721312] [<ffffffff8115814e>] fput+0xfe/0x240
[17318.721313] [<ffffffff811546ec>] filp_close+0x6c/0x90
[17318.721314] [<ffffffff8105a810>] put_files_struct+0xa0/0x120
[17318.721315] [<ffffffff8105a96c>] exit_files+0x5c/0x70
[17318.721316] [<ffffffff8105aeaf>] do_exit+0x17f/0x900
[17318.721317] [<ffffffff8105b9af>] do_group_exit+0x4f/0xd0
[17318.721318] [<ffffffff8105ba47>] sys_exit_group+0x17/0x20
[17318.721319] [<ffffffff8161456b>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
After that opcontrol can no longer start.
>> me a warning of in_atomic, so I moved to exit. This also allowed me to
>> remove the null pointer checks, by zeroing reset_value on shutdown. But
>> even with shutdown being broken on -rt at least I can run oprofile now. :)
> If there is a problem I tend to fix it by using a hard coded array:
>
> static unsigned long reset_value[OP_MAX_COUNTER];
Ah, that looks better, thanks. I wanted to use a static array,
but didn't know the max value I should use.
> See arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_amd.c.
>
> But still can't see the problem you want to fix.
It gives a warning on rt because it allocates memory in something
that runs on all cpus. I think the OP_MAX_COUNTER fix is fine, since
amd does similar.
~Maarten
Original bug:
[ 46.460786] oprofile: using NMI interrupt.
[ 47.492263] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/rtmutex.c:645
[ 47.492265] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 0, name: kworker/0:1
[ 47.492267] Pid: 0, comm: kworker/0:1 Tainted: G C 3.0.0-rt3-patser+ #39
[ 47.492269] Call Trace:
[ 47.492270] <IRQ> [<ffffffff8103fc0a>] __might_sleep+0xca/0xf0
[ 47.492279] [<ffffffff8160d424>] rt_spin_lock+0x24/0x40
[ 47.492282] [<ffffffff811476c7>] __kmalloc+0xc7/0x370
[ 47.492287] [<ffffffffa0275c85>] ? ppro_setup_ctrs+0x215/0x260 [oprofile]
[ 47.492291] [<ffffffffa0273de0>] ? oprofile_cpu_notifier+0x60/0x60 [oprofile]
[ 47.492295] [<ffffffffa0275c85>] ppro_setup_ctrs+0x215/0x260 [oprofile]
[ 47.492305] [<ffffffffa0273de0>] ? oprofile_cpu_notifier+0x60/0x60 [oprofile]
[ 47.492307] [<ffffffffa0273de0>] ? oprofile_cpu_notifier+0x60/0x60 [oprofile]
[ 47.492308] [<ffffffffa0273ea4>] nmi_cpu_setup+0xc4/0x110 [oprofile]
[ 47.492310] [<ffffffff81094455>] generic_smp_call_function_interrupt+0x95/0x190
[ 47.492313] [<ffffffff8101df77>] smp_call_function_interrupt+0x27/0x40
[ 47.492315] [<ffffffff81615093>] call_function_interrupt+0x13/0x20
[ 47.492316] <EOI> [<ffffffff8131d0c4>] ? plist_check_head+0x54/0xc0
[ 47.492321] [<ffffffff81371fe8>] ? intel_idle+0xc8/0x120
[ 47.492322] [<ffffffff81371fc7>] ? intel_idle+0xa7/0x120
[ 47.492324] [<ffffffff814a57b0>] cpuidle_idle_call+0xb0/0x230
[ 47.492326] [<ffffffff810011db>] cpu_idle+0x8b/0xe0
[ 47.492328] [<ffffffff815fc82f>] start_secondary+0x1d3/0x1d8
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-01 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-31 18:39 [PATCH v2] oprofile, x86: Move memory allocation for ppro out of per cpu Maarten Lankhorst
2011-08-01 7:07 ` Robert Richter
2011-08-01 12:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-01 14:57 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2011-08-01 15:08 ` [PATCH v3] oprofile, x86: Convert memory allocation to static array Maarten Lankhorst
2011-08-01 16:20 ` Andi Kleen
2011-08-01 21:31 ` Robert Richter
2011-08-01 21:41 ` Andi Kleen
2011-08-01 22:16 ` Robert Richter
2011-08-16 22:11 ` [PATCH] oprofile, x86: Fix overflow and warning (commit 1d12d35) Robert Richter
2011-08-01 22:02 ` [PATCH v3] oprofile, x86: Convert memory allocation to static array Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E36BEE5.9060006@gmail.com \
--to=m.b.lankhorst@gmail.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox