From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751528Ab1HCG5h (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Aug 2011 02:57:37 -0400 Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([222.73.24.84]:59609 "EHLO song.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750811Ab1HCG5b (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Aug 2011 02:57:31 -0400 Message-ID: <4E38D8B7.70006@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 13:12:23 +0800 From: Gui Jianfeng User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Chinner CC: Vivek Goyal , Jens Axboe , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: fio posixaio performance problem References: <4E38C314.8070305@cn.fujitsu.com> <20110803040613.GJ12870@dastard> <4E38D2F5.5050702@cn.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <4E38D2F5.5050702@cn.fujitsu.com> X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on mailserver/fnst(Release 8.5.1FP4|July 25, 2010) at 2011-08-03 13:11:02, Serialize by Router on mailserver/fnst(Release 8.5.1FP4|July 25, 2010) at 2011-08-03 13:11:05, Serialize complete at 2011-08-03 13:11:05 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2011-8-3 12:47, Gui Jianfeng wrote: > On 2011-8-3 12:06, Dave Chinner wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 11:40:04AM +0800, Gui Jianfeng wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I ran a fio test to simulate qemu-kvm io behaviour. >>> When job number is greater than 2, IO performance is >>> really bad. >>> >>> 1 thread: aggrb=15,129KB/s >>> 4 thread: aggrb=1,049KB/s >>> >>> Kernel: lastest upstream >>> >>> Any idea? >>> >>> --- >>> [global] >>> runtime=30 >>> time_based=1 >>> size=1G >>> group_reporting=1 >>> ioengine=posixaio >>> exec_prerun='echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches' >>> thread=1 >>> >>> [kvmio-1] >>> description=kvmio-1 >>> numjobs=4 >>> rw=write >>> bs=4k >>> direct=1 >>> filename=/mnt/sda4/1G.img >> >> What filesystem? > > Ext4 BTW, even if on Ext3, the problem is still there. Thanks, Gui > > Thanks, > Gui > >> >> Cheers, >> >> Dave. >