From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754924Ab1HCSlp (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Aug 2011 14:41:45 -0400 Received: from mail-iy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.210.174]:48089 "EHLO mail-iy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753980Ab1HCSlk (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Aug 2011 14:41:40 -0400 Message-ID: <4E39965F.703@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 13:41:35 -0500 From: Rob Herring User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Arnd Bergmann CC: Grant Likely , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , linux@arm.linux.org.uk, Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>, workgroup.linux@csr.com, Olof Johansson , tglx@linutronix.de, weizeng.he@csr.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] ARM: l2x0: Add OF based initialization References: <1309984979-8847-1-git-send-email-robherring2@gmail.com> <1309984979-8847-2-git-send-email-robherring2@gmail.com> <20110706210237.GB5371@ponder.secretlab.ca> <201107062326.53737.arnd@arndb.de> In-Reply-To: <201107062326.53737.arnd@arndb.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/06/2011 04:26 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 06 July 2011 23:02:37 Grant Likely wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 03:42:59PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: >>> From: Rob Herring >>> >>> This adds probing for ARM L2x0 cache controllers via device tree. Support >>> includes the L210, L220, and PL310 controllers. The binding allows setting >>> up cache RAM latencies and filter addresses (PL310 only). >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring >> >> Acked-by: Grant Likely >> >> By rights, this should go via the arm tree, but it depends on patches >> that are already in devicetree/next. Arnd, how do you want to handle >> this? I want to avoid rebasing devicetree/next. > > It's outside of the scope of the arm-soc tree really, the l2x0 code > is clearly core arm stuff, so it belongs into Russell's tree. > > I think it's best if Russell can provide an Ack for this and you > put it in the tree that already has the dependencies. > As the dependency is in Linus' tree now, I submitted this to Russell's patch system. Rob