Re: [PATCH RFCv2 0/8] sched: Enforce order of leaf CFS runqueues (and list cleanup)

["Jan Schönherr" <schnhrr@cs.tu-berlin.de>]

Hi Peter,

Am 27.07.2011 21:10, schrieb Jan H. Schönherr:
> Patch 1: After inventing __list_link(), I realized, that this
> 	 function already existed, but with a different name.
> 
> 	 This patch just does some renaming. Not really needed,
> 	 but if I use the old naming in patch 2 it's really 
> 	 hard to understand what's actually going on.
> 
> 	 It also helps to increase the readability of the existing
> 	 code, see patches 6-8.
> 
> Patch 2: This introduces new list functions to splice RCU lists
> 	 and handle deleted RCU list entries.
> 
> Patch 3: The actual bugfix.
> 
> Patch 4+5: Follow-ups to patch 1. Some more renaming and use of
> 	   appropriate functions.
> 
> Patch 6: Another follow-up to patch 1, improving the readability of
> 	 the list routines a bit.
> 
> Patch 7+8: Follow-ups to patch 2. Make use of the introduced
>            functionality in the already existing code.


I am wondering, whether v3 should consist basically only of
patches 2 and 3, i. e. the minimal approach, or if you would
take all of them?

If you prefer the minimal version, I would make another patch
set out of the other patches. But as there seems to be no official
maintainer for list related functionality, I would appreciate
some hints who I should put on the TO/CC list.

Regards
Jan