public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@mit.edu>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	lueckintel@yahoo.com, kimwooyoung@gmail.com,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86-64: Allow emulated vsyscalls from user addresses
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 13:59:20 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E418388.9050600@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <135b827ce7b4e6059f11de631ea4a455e2b433be.1312899174.git.luto@mit.edu>

On 08/09/2011 09:27 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>   *
>   *  Vectors   0 ...  31 : system traps and exceptions - hardcoded events
> - *  Vectors  32 ... 127 : device interrupts
> - *  Vector  128         : legacy int80 syscall interface
> - *  Vector  204         : legacy x86_64 vsyscall emulation
> - *  Vectors 129 ... INVALIDATE_TLB_VECTOR_START-1 except 204 : device interrupts
> + *  Vectors  32 ... INVALIDATE_TLB_VECTOR_START-1 : device interrupts, except:
> + *   Vectors 64 ... 66  : legacy x86_64 vsyscall emulation
> + *   Vector  128        : legacy int80 syscall interface
>   *  Vectors INVALIDATE_TLB_VECTOR_START ... 255 : special interrupts
>   *

Hi Andy,

Was there a reason to not use the vectors in the 0x2X range?

	-hpa


  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-09 19:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-09 14:27 [PATCH 0/4] vsyscall tweaks Andy Lutomirski
2011-08-09 14:27 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86-64: Allow emulated vsyscalls from user addresses Andy Lutomirski
2011-08-09 18:59   ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2011-08-09 19:16     ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-08-09 14:27 ` [PATCH 2/4] x86: Remove unnecessary compile flag tweaks for vsyscall code Andy Lutomirski
2011-08-09 14:27 ` [PATCH 3/4] x86-64: Wire up getcpu syscall Andy Lutomirski
2011-08-09 14:27 ` [PATCH 4/4] Add vsyscalls to feature-removal-schedule.txt Andy Lutomirski
2011-08-12 18:25   ` NACK! " Andi Kleen
2011-08-12 19:13     ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-08-17 20:35       ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E418388.9050600@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=kimwooyoung@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lueckintel@yahoo.com \
    --cc=luto@mit.edu \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox