From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753524Ab1HKU2J (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Aug 2011 16:28:09 -0400 Received: from claw.goop.org ([74.207.240.146]:40207 "EHLO claw.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751509Ab1HKU2I (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Aug 2011 16:28:08 -0400 Message-ID: <4E443B52.3080609@goop.org> Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 13:28:02 -0700 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110707 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Lutomirski CC: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , keir.xen@gmail.com, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Collected vdso/vsyscall fixes for 3.1 References: <20110803135322.GC29501@dumpdata.com> <20110803135604.GA29761@dumpdata.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 08/03/2011 06:59 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 09:53:22AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >>> On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 09:31:48AM -0400, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >>>> This fixes various problems that cropped up with the vdso patches. >>>> >>>> - Patch 1 fixes an information leak to userspace. >>>> - Patches 2 and 3 fix the kernel build on gold. >>>> - Patches 4 and 5 fix Xen (I hope). >>>> - Patch 6 (optional) adds a trace event to vsyscall emulation. It will >>>> make it easier to handle performance regression reports :) >>> Hm, you seemed to have the x86 maintainers on your email.. >> I definitly need some coffee. What I meant was that you missing putting >> the x86 maintainers on this patchset. They are the ones that will handle this. >> >> I put them on the To list for you. > Are you sure about that coffee? I'm pretty sure I had x86@kernel.org in there. What's the state of this series? Has tip.git picked it up, or does it need another go-around? I just booted a Linus tree and got a backtrace that looks like this issue, though I haven't looked into it in detail yet. Thanks, J