From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753953Ab1HRVD6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Aug 2011 17:03:58 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:25702 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753400Ab1HRVD5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Aug 2011 17:03:57 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,352,1309762800"; d="scan'208";a="39802388" Message-ID: <4E4D7E3C.8060104@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 14:03:56 -0700 From: Andi Kleen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vivek Goyal CC: Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org, Jens Axboe Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11] VFS: Cache request_queue in struct block_device References: <1312259893-4548-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> <1312259893-4548-11-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> <20110818194245.GJ15413@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20110818194245.GJ15413@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Is the performance gain because of this one less dereference really > substantial. Yes it is measurable on a large macro benchmark. The gain is from doing the prefetch early enough, and that needs the additional pointer. -Andi