From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753465Ab1HSCmL (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Aug 2011 22:42:11 -0400 Received: from mail7.hitachi.co.jp ([133.145.228.42]:56674 "EHLO mail7.hitachi.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751830Ab1HSCmJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Aug 2011 22:42:09 -0400 X-AuditID: b753bd60-a1286ba000000655-73-4e4dcd7eaa75 X-AuditID: b753bd60-a1286ba000000655-73-4e4dcd7eaa75 Message-ID: <4E4DCD59.1070203@hitachi.com> Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 11:41:29 +0900 From: Masami Hiramatsu Organization: Systems Development Lab., Hitachi, Ltd., Japan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steven Rostedt Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , Frederic Weisbecker , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Jason Baron , yrl.pp-manager.tt@hitachi.com, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5][RFC] kprobes/ftrace: Have kprobes use ftrace on ftrace nops References: <20110810162222.017387055@goodmis.org> <4E43209D.7090104@hitachi.com> <1313022842.18583.282.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <4E43769C.9000901@hitachi.com> <1313067691.18583.290.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <4E44967C.1090101@hitachi.com> <1313154537.18583.319.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <4E464D6C.9020807@hitachi.com> <1313290684.18583.362.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <4E47A33E.5020202@hitachi.com> <1313413562.15704.5.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <4E4BB041.1050004@hitachi.com> <1313697988.15704.77.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> In-Reply-To: <1313697988.15704.77.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (2011/08/19 5:06), Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 21:12 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > >> I see. OK, I'm now looking forward to your work ;) > > Hi Masami, > > BTW, do you have any test suits that I could use to test the changes I > make. Something that I may be able to catch regressions with? Yes, here are the test to ensure putting probes on module/module init code. http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=65795E11DBF1E645A09CEC7EAEE94B9C39F68E90%40USINDEVS02.corp.hds.com&forum_name=dle-develop http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=65795E11DBF1E645A09CEC7EAEE94B9C39F68E8F%40USINDEVS02.corp.hds.com&forum_name=dle-develop Also, basic smoke test is already in the kernel. BTW, I think we may need more testcases for checking registers etc. Thank you, -- Masami HIRAMATSU Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Center Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com