public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Brad Campbell <lists2009@fnarfbargle.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>, CaT <cat@zip.com.au>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: KVM induced panic on 2.6.38[2367] & 2.6.39
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 09:36:04 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E51F8D4.5070804@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E4FB3B7.4040501@fnarfbargle.com>

On 08/20/2011 04:16 PM, Brad Campbell wrote:
> Author: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
> Date:   Thu Jul 1 13:28:27 2010 +0000
>
>     x86: Drop CONFIG_MCORE2 check around setting of NET_IP_ALIGN
>
>     This patch removes the CONFIG_MCORE2 check from around 
> NET_IP_ALIGN.  It is
>     based on a suggestion from Andi Kleen.  The assumption is that 
> there are
>     not any x86 cores where unaligned access is really slow, and this 
> change
>     would allow for a performance improvement to still exist on 
> configurations
>     that are not necessarily optimized for Core 2.
>
>     Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
>     Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>     Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
>     Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
>     Cc: x86@kernel.org
>     Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
>     Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
>     Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
>     Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
>
> :040000 040000 5a15867789080a2f67a74b17c4422f85b7a9fb4a 
> b98769348bd765731ca3ff03b33764257e23226c M    arch
>
> I can confirm this bug exists in the 3.0 kernel, however I'm unable to 
> reproduce it on todays git.
>
> So anyone using netfilter, kvm and bridge on kernels between 
> 2.6.36-rc1 and 3.0 may hit this bug, but it looks like it is fixed in 
> the current 3.1-rc kernels.
>

Thanks for this effort.  I don't think this patch is buggy in itself, it 
merely exposed another bug which was fixed later on.

-- 
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.


  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-22  6:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-31  1:24 KVM induced panic on 2.6.38[2367] & 2.6.39 Brad Campbell
2011-05-31  5:47 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-05-31  9:26   ` Brad Campbell
2011-05-31 10:38     ` Borislav Petkov
2011-05-31 14:24       ` Brad Campbell
2011-05-31 22:31         ` Hugh Dickins
2011-06-01  0:18           ` Brad Campbell
2011-06-01  0:37           ` Brad Campbell
2011-06-01  1:15             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-01  2:03               ` Brad Campbell
2011-06-01  4:52               ` Hugh Dickins
2011-06-01  6:31                 ` Brad Campbell
2011-06-01  6:56                   ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-01  9:29                     ` Brad Campbell
2011-06-01  9:40                       ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-01  9:41                         ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-01 10:53                           ` Brad Campbell
2011-06-01 11:09                             ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-01 11:18                             ` CaT
2011-06-01 11:52                               ` Brad Campbell
2011-06-01 23:03                                 ` CaT
2011-06-03 13:38                                   ` Brad Campbell
2011-06-03 15:50                                     ` Bernhard Held
2011-06-03 16:07                                       ` Brad Campbell
2011-06-06 20:10                                         ` Bart De Schuymer
2011-06-06 20:23                                           ` Eric Dumazet
2011-06-07  3:33                                           ` Brad Campbell
2011-06-07 13:30                                             ` Patrick McHardy
2011-06-07 14:40                                               ` Brad Campbell
2011-06-07 15:35                                                 ` Patrick McHardy
2011-06-07 18:31                                                   ` Eric Dumazet
2011-06-07 22:57                                                     ` Patrick McHardy
2011-06-08  0:18                                                       ` Brad Campbell
2011-06-08  3:59                                                         ` Eric Dumazet
2011-06-08 17:02                                                           ` Brad Campbell
2011-06-08 21:22                                                             ` Eric Dumazet
2011-06-10  2:52                                                             ` Simon Horman
2011-06-10 12:37                                                               ` Mark Lord
2011-06-10 16:43                                                                 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2011-06-12 15:38                                                               ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-07 23:43                                                   ` Brad Campbell
2011-06-07 18:04                                                 ` Bart De Schuymer
2011-06-08  0:15                                                   ` Brad Campbell
2011-06-05  8:14                                     ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-05 13:45                                       ` Brad Campbell
2011-06-05 13:58                                         ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-06 20:22                                         ` Eric Dumazet
2011-06-07 13:27                                           ` Brad Campbell
2011-06-07 13:37                                             ` Eric Dumazet
2011-06-07 15:15                                               ` Brad Campbell
2011-08-20 13:16                                               ` Brad Campbell
2011-08-22  6:36                                                 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2011-08-22  6:45                                                   ` Eric Dumazet
2011-08-22 11:45                                                     ` Brad Campbell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E51F8D4.5070804@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=cat@zip.com.au \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lists2009@fnarfbargle.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox