From: Milan Broz <mbroz@redhat.com>
To: Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Q: /sys/block and I/O Schedulers
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 13:15:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E523A63.3060405@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E52473A020000A1000070BC@gwsmtp1.uni-regensburg.de>
On 08/22/2011 12:10 PM, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> I have a question: Reading the docs on I/O Schedulers, I had the
> impression the docs wanted to tell me that only the low-level devices
> (i.e. disks) use I/O Schedulers, while higher-level devices (like
> multipaths, RAIDs, LVs, etc.) don't.
As you already found, low-level device has always real io scheduler.
Device-mapper use stacked device logic - IOW mapped device
is stacked over some real device(s).
Remapping works on bio level, not on IO request level.
Separate bios are simple remapped to low-level devices where
io scheduler does its job.
There is one exception: dm-multipath which uses "request based" mapping,
IOW it means it uses own scheduler on device-mapper level
(But in old kernels it was on bio level as well,
for more info see https://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/15/411)
> Using the SLES11 SP1 kernel (2.6.32.43-0.4-xen), I found out that LVs
> seem to use the I/O Scheduler
LVs (e.g. linear mappings) do not use own scheduler. But /queue directory
contains more attributes which need to be visible there.
> My test was as simple as this: /sys/block # for d in *
>> do echo $d: $(<$d/queue/scheduler) done
Btw see "lsblk -t" - here you can see stacked devices with scheduler
and topology info parsed from sysfs (in new util-linux).
Milan
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-22 11:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-22 10:10 Q: /sys/block and I/O Schedulers Ulrich Windl
2011-08-22 11:15 ` Milan Broz [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E523A63.3060405@redhat.com \
--to=mbroz@redhat.com \
--cc=Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox