From: "Pádraig Brady" <P@draigBrady.com>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
bookjovi@gmail.com, dhowells@redhat.com, roland@redhat.com,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coredump: fix pipe coredump when core limit is 0
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 16:32:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E527684.3020206@draigBrady.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48dnn9u5x3e4qoh8meht42xk.1313966177259@email.android.com>
On 08/21/2011 11:36 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> Concur. The comment should be changed
> Neil
>
> Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On 08/21, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08/21, bookjovi@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>> For non-pipe case, limit 0 also means drop the coredump, so just put
>>>> the zero limit check at do_coredump function begining.
>>>
>>> Neil, what do you think? Should we change the code or the comment?
>>
>> Personally I think we should fix the comment. I think RLIMIT_CORE
>> doesn't apply in this case, limit == 1 check is very special. And
>> this is what linux always did, except between 725eae32 and 898b374a.
Sorry for jumping in late here.
I would really like `ulimit -c 0` to completely disable core dumps,
including not running core_pattern, as I also mentioned here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/62511
I noticed this in a script where ctrl-\ was taking a long
time to be registered as the core_pattern was run unconditionally.
Testing on 2.6.38.8-34.fc15.x86_64 here shows the IMHO problematic behavior:
# echo "|/bin/true" > /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern
# ulimit -c 0
# cat
^\Quit (core dumped)
cheers,
Pádraig.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-22 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-21 22:36 [PATCH] coredump: fix pipe coredump when core limit is 0 Neil Horman
2011-08-22 13:23 ` Jovi Zhang
2011-08-22 13:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-08-22 15:32 ` Pádraig Brady [this message]
2011-08-22 16:19 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-08-24 10:14 ` Jovi Zhang
2011-08-24 10:17 ` Jovi Zhang
2011-08-24 11:01 ` Neil Horman
2011-08-25 10:03 ` Pádraig Brady
2011-08-25 10:55 ` Neil Horman
2011-08-26 9:15 ` Pádraig Brady
2011-08-25 15:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-08-25 18:43 ` Neil Horman
2011-08-26 14:11 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-08-26 15:39 ` Neil Horman
2011-08-26 9:09 ` Pádraig Brady
2011-08-26 14:10 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-11-14 5:49 ` Jovi Zhang
2012-07-07 11:35 ` Jovi Zhang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-08-21 11:25 bookjovi
2011-08-21 15:25 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-08-21 15:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E527684.3020206@draigBrady.com \
--to=p@draigbrady.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bookjovi@gmail.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox