From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755754Ab1HWSyW (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Aug 2011 14:54:22 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:37205 "EHLO mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755687Ab1HWSyN (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Aug 2011 14:54:13 -0400 Message-ID: <4E53F750.2050408@suse.cz> Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 20:54:08 +0200 From: Jiri Slaby User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Arnd Bergmann CC: gregkh@suse.de, alan@linux.intel.com, Linux kernel mailing list Subject: Re: patch "TTY: remove tty_locked" added to tty tree References: <13141210141189@kroah.org> <4E53F282.10908@suse.cz> <2337681.paSeVyBarJ@wuerfel> In-Reply-To: <2337681.paSeVyBarJ@wuerfel> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 08/23/2011 08:46 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > According to http://kernelnewbies.org/BigKernelLock, I concluded back then > that tty_wait_until_sent would always be called without BTM held. Has that > changed recently, or did I miss a caller that holds the BTM? Every tty_operations->close and ->hangup :). -- js suse labs