public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	James Bottomley <JBottomley@parallels.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] parse options in the vfs level
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 23:19:26 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E545FAE.5040008@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110815070932.GF26978@dastard>

On 08/15/2011 04:09 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 07:13:52PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
>> This patch introduces a simple generic vfs option parser.
>> Right now, the only option we have is to limit the size of the dcache.
>>
>> So any user that wants to have a dcache entries limit, can specify:
>>
>>    mount -o whatever_options,vfs_dcache_size=XXX<dev>  <mntpoint>
>>
>> It is supposed to work well with remounts, allowing it to change
>> multiple over the course of the filesystem's lifecycle.
>>
>> I find mount a natural interface for handling filesystem options,
>> so that's what I've choosen. Feel free to yell at it at will if
>> you disagree.
>
> It's already been noted by both myself and Al that there is not a
> 1:1 mapping between mount point and superblocks....

I had skipped that one in my pending patches.

Well, it's already been noted by me as well. And by anybody.
The problem, however, is not new. Filesystems exports fs-specific
options that operate on the superblock as well. And we've been living 
alright with them.

>> @@ -2350,6 +2449,12 @@ long do_mount(char *dev_name, char *dir_name, char *type_page,
>>   	else
>>   		retval = do_new_mount(&path, type_page, flags, mnt_flags,
>>   				      dev_name, data_page);
>> +
>> +	/* bind mounts get to respect their parents decision */
>> +	if (!retval&&  !(flags&  MS_BIND))
>> +		vfs_set_dcache_size(path.mnt->mnt_sb,
>> +				    vfs_options.vfs_dcache_size);
>> +			
>
> And I'm not sure that silently ignoring it in certain cases
> is the best way around that problem.

It is not "in certain cases". It is : 1) When bind mounting, and 2) When 
an error occurs. Pretty well-defined.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-24  2:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-14 15:13 [PATCH v3 0/4] Per-container dcache limitation Glauber Costa
2011-08-14 15:13 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] factor out single-shrinker code Glauber Costa
2011-08-15  6:43   ` Dave Chinner
2011-08-14 15:13 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] Keep nr_dentry per super block Glauber Costa
2011-08-14 17:38   ` Eric Dumazet
2011-08-14 15:13 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] limit nr_dentries per superblock Glauber Costa
2011-08-15  7:03   ` Dave Chinner
2011-08-15  7:12   ` Pekka Enberg
2011-08-15 10:46     ` Dave Chinner
2011-08-15 10:58       ` Pekka Enberg
2011-08-15 11:05         ` Pavel Emelyanov
2011-08-15 11:14           ` Pekka Enberg
2011-08-15 11:32             ` Pavel Emelyanov
2011-08-15 11:55               ` Pekka Enberg
2011-08-15 12:12                 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2011-08-15 12:23                   ` Pekka Enberg
2011-08-15 12:37                     ` Pavel Emelyanov
2011-08-16  2:11             ` Dave Chinner
2011-08-14 15:13 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] parse options in the vfs level Glauber Costa
2011-08-14 15:39   ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-15  0:03     ` Glauber Costa
2011-08-15  7:09   ` Dave Chinner
2011-08-24  2:19     ` Glauber Costa [this message]
2011-08-17  5:43 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] Per-container dcache limitation Dave Chinner
2011-08-17 18:44   ` Glauber Costa
2011-08-18  1:27     ` Dave Chinner
2011-08-22 11:42       ` Glauber Costa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E545FAE.5040008@parallels.com \
    --to=glommer@parallels.com \
    --cc=JBottomley@parallels.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@kernel.dk \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=xemul@parallels.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox