From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
To: Steevven1 <steevven1@gmail.com>
Cc: Anca Emanuel <anca.emanuel@gmail.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: Bug Report for Linux Kernel 3.x
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 09:46:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E552B01.7090109@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFWT=80YV-+-COSfGnuDTSxqy17kgXCQpCVJD1b2yif_nM=1Yg@mail.gmail.com>
On 8/24/2011 9:44 AM, Steevven1 wrote:
> VERY interesting! The second link seems to imply that Phoronix has
> independently found this same bug that we've been talking about in my
> originally-linked ubuntuforums discussion. Specifically, the
> interesting quote is:
>
> "Besides the new Linux 3.1 kernel power regression, there's also a
> power regression introduced in the Linux 3.0 kernel that has
> previously not been talked about on Phoronix. The Linux 3.0 power draw
> is up by 24% over the Linux 2.6.39 kernel."
sounds like good news; a 24% regression is MUCH easier to bisect than a
0.05% regression ;-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-24 16:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-23 23:19 Bug Report for Linux Kernel 3.x Steevven1
2011-08-24 0:11 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-08-24 0:21 ` Steevven1
2011-08-24 13:58 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-08-24 15:08 ` Arjan van de Ven
2011-08-24 15:52 ` Anca Emanuel
2011-08-24 16:44 ` Steevven1
2011-08-24 16:46 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2011-08-26 6:37 ` Steevven1
2011-08-24 3:58 ` Dave Jones
2011-08-24 4:00 ` Steevven1
2011-08-24 13:25 ` Jeff Chua
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E552B01.7090109@linux.intel.com \
--to=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anca.emanuel@gmail.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steevven1@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox