From: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Cc: "Sakkinen, Jarkko" <jarkko.sakkinen@intel.com>,
Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Smack: SMACK_IOCLOADACCESS
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 20:16:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E58375E.3010603@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E58175A.9090209@schaufler-ca.com>
On 08/26/2011 05:59 PM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> On 8/26/2011 10:01 AM, Eric Paris wrote:
> Better to have a single question answered as required and with
> complete accuracy than to carry around the baggage necessary to
> maintain a cached duplicate of the kernel's rules and all the
> bookkeeping that requires. SELinux libraries probably have to
> make a system call just to determine if the caches they are
> maintaining are out of date.
Come on Casey, this is Linux. We have choices! I believe there are
currently 3 solutions to solving the 'out of date caches' problem. The
first and oldest is just a syscall per access request option (I think it
does read() but don't remember). There is an option to get a netlink
message informing you to flush your cache. SE-XWindows found that ONE
syscall per check was WAY WAY WAY too much overhead and uses this
method. There is also a magic selinuxfs file which a userspace process
can mmap and just read the memory location to tell if a reload occurred.
SE-PostgreSQL uses this method because their software architecture did
not have a good way to handle a netlink socket.
The value of the userspace cache is admittedly entirely a question of
the willingness to accept the overhead of kernel lookups.
/me checks out of thread.
-Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-27 0:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-26 5:52 [PATCH] Smack: SMACK_IOCLOADACCESS Jarkko Sakkinen
2011-08-26 12:50 ` Eric Paris
2011-08-26 13:14 ` Alan Cox
2011-08-26 17:36 ` Stephen Smalley
2011-08-26 16:05 ` Sakkinen, Jarkko
2011-08-26 17:01 ` Eric Paris
2011-08-26 21:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2011-08-27 0:16 ` Eric Paris [this message]
2011-08-27 5:57 ` Sakkinen, Jarkko
2011-08-26 16:26 ` Casey Schaufler
2011-08-26 17:28 ` Stephen Smalley
2011-08-26 21:47 ` Casey Schaufler
2011-08-26 17:26 ` Randy Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E58375E.3010603@redhat.com \
--to=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=eparis@parisplace.org \
--cc=jarkko.sakkinen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox