From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754675Ab1H0A6X (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Aug 2011 20:58:23 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:56014 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754411Ab1H0A6W (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Aug 2011 20:58:22 -0400 Message-ID: <4E5840FE.5090705@zytor.com> Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 17:57:34 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110816 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linus Torvalds CC: LKML , "H.J. Lu" , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: RFD: x32 ABI system call numbers References: <4E582577.2060805@zytor.com> <4E582EAA.1040108@zytor.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 08/26/2011 05:36 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > If you want to be compatible with "int 0x80" and old libraries, then I > really don't see why you would introduce *anything* new. Just to be clear, the reason to keep the LFS stuff in there was to be compatible with the existing 32-bit *programming model*, so that a program recompiled from i386 to x32 should behave the same. Not that anyone should compile without -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 these days... -hpa