public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wang Sheng-Hui <shhuiw@gmail.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: wanlong.gao@gmail.com, rusty@rustcorp.com.au,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio: fix size computation according to the definition of struct vring_used in vring_size
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2011 20:48:36 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E5A3924.4050006@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110828113132.GB4875@redhat.com>

On 2011年08月28日 19:31, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 05:52:02PM +0800, Wang Sheng-Hui wrote:
>> On 2011年08月27日 17:34, Wang Sheng-Hui wrote:
>>> On 2011年08月27日 10:49, Wanlong Gao wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 2011-08-27 at 09:07 +0800, Wang Sheng-Hui wrote:
>>>>> The patch is against 3.1-rc3.
>>>>>
>>>>> struct vring_used has two __u16 fields plus array of struct vring_used_elem.
>>>>> Current vring_size counts the __u16 fields to 3. Fix it to 2 in the patch.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Wang Sheng-Hui <shhuiw@gmail.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  include/linux/virtio_ring.h |    2 +-
>>>>>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_ring.h b/include/linux/virtio_ring.h
>>>>> index 4a32cb6..fcda152 100644
>>>>> --- a/include/linux/virtio_ring.h
>>>>> +++ b/include/linux/virtio_ring.h
>>>>> @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ static inline unsigned vring_size(unsigned int num, unsigned long align)
>>>>>  {
>>>>>  	return ((sizeof(struct vring_desc) * num + sizeof(__u16) * (2 + num)
>>>>>  		 + align - 1) & ~(align - 1))
>>>>> -		+ sizeof(__u16) * 3 + sizeof(struct vring_used_elem) * num;
>>>>> +		+ sizeof(__u16) * 2 + sizeof(struct vring_used_elem) * num;
>>>>>  }
>>>>>  
>>>>>  /* The following is used with USED_EVENT_IDX and AVAIL_EVENT_IDX */
>>>>
>>>> Hi:
>>>> I'm not deep into it, but I think you can see this:
>>>> http://marc.info/?l=git-commits-head&m=130687915816130&w=2
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> -Wanlong Gao
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> I checked the comments, and think we should patch vring_init
>>> and vring_size according to the layout description in the comments.
>>> Right?
>>
>> New patch generated. Please check it. Thanks,
> 
> 
>> [PATCH] virtio: modify vring_init and vring_size to take account of the layout containing *_event_idx
>>
>> The patch is against 3.1-rc3.
>>
>> Based on the layout description in the comments, take account of
>> the *_event_idx in functions vring_init and vring_size.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wang Sheng-Hui <shhuiw@gmail.com>
> 
> Is this a bugfix or just a cleanup?
> Alignment makes us get the same values with and without, right?

It's just a cleanup.
For normal case, the value 16 is too small compared with
the alignment, I think.

> 
>> ---
>>  include/linux/virtio_ring.h |    6 +++---
>>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_ring.h b/include/linux/virtio_ring.h
>> index 4a32cb6..300af76 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/virtio_ring.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/virtio_ring.h
>> @@ -135,13 +135,13 @@ static inline void vring_init(struct vring *vr, unsigned int num, void *p,
>>  	vr->num = num;
>>  	vr->desc = p;
>>  	vr->avail = p + num*sizeof(struct vring_desc);
>> -	vr->used = (void *)(((unsigned long)&vr->avail->ring[num] + align-1)
>> -			    & ~(align - 1));
>> +	vr->used = (void *)(((unsigned long)&vr->avail->ring[num] + 16
>> +		+ align-1) & ~(align - 1));
>>  }
>>  
>>  static inline unsigned vring_size(unsigned int num, unsigned long align)
>>  {
>> -	return ((sizeof(struct vring_desc) * num + sizeof(__u16) * (2 + num)
>> +	return ((sizeof(struct vring_desc) * num + sizeof(__u16) * (3 + num)
>>  		 + align - 1) & ~(align - 1))
>>  		+ sizeof(__u16) * 3 + sizeof(struct vring_used_elem) * num;
>>  }
>> -- 
>> 1.7.1
>>


  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-28 12:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-27  1:07 [PATCH] virtio: fix size computation according to the definition of struct vring_used in vring_size Wang Sheng-Hui
2011-08-27  2:49 ` Wanlong Gao
2011-08-27  9:34   ` Wang Sheng-Hui
2011-08-27  9:52     ` Wang Sheng-Hui
2011-08-28 11:31       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-08-28 12:48         ` Wang Sheng-Hui [this message]
2011-08-29  2:53       ` Rusty Russell
2011-08-29  6:51         ` Wang Sheng-Hui
2011-08-29  7:55         ` Wang Sheng-Hui
2011-08-30  0:12           ` Rusty Russell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E5A3924.4050006@gmail.com \
    --to=shhuiw@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=wanlong.gao@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox