From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754558Ab1H3OgT (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Aug 2011 10:36:19 -0400 Received: from a.ns.miles-group.at ([95.130.255.143]:38148 "EHLO radon.swed.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754153Ab1H3OgS (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Aug 2011 10:36:18 -0400 Message-ID: <4E5CF55F.3040600@nod.at> Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:36:15 +0200 From: Richard Weinberger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?QW3DqXJpY28gV2FuZw==?= CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, dchinner@redhat.com, hch@lst.de Subject: Re: [PATCH] ramfs: Remove module leftovers References: <1314631491-27095-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am 30.08.2011 16:29, schrieb Américo Wang: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:24 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: >> Since ramfs is hard-selected to "y", the module leftovers make >> no sense. >> >> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger > > Yeah, it makes sense to remove these module stuffs, > but I think there is no need to make exit_ramfs_fs() > be an __exit_call, so just remove exit_ramfs_fs()? True. There no need to unregister ramfs. I'll resend an updated patch! Thanks, //richard