From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751600Ab1IECBE (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Sep 2011 22:01:04 -0400 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]:34750 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750793Ab1IECA4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Sep 2011 22:00:56 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.68,330,1312182000"; d="scan'208";a="45552964" Message-ID: <4E642D55.7010500@intel.com> Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 10:00:53 +0800 From: Huang Ying User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110820 Iceowl/1.0b2 Icedove/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mathieu Desnoyers CC: LKML , Peter Zijlstra , Andi Kleen , "lenb@kernel.org" , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [RFC patch 1/2] Rename the "llist" (lockless list) to "llstack" (lockless stack) References: <20110903174721.390074195@efficios.com> <20110903175543.363519825@efficios.com> In-Reply-To: <20110903175543.363519825@efficios.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org IMHO, I prefer to keep "llist" as the name of the best general lock-less list we can implemented. Maybe in the future we can replace the implementation totally, or add/change its API. I don't like the name of "llstack" because we don't want to implement or use a lock-less stack, we just can only implement stack like operations so far, maybe in the future we can work out some solution for other operations. Best Regards, Huang Ying