public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Paul Menage <paul@paulmenage.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>,
	Tim Hockin <thockin@hockin.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Aditya Kali <adityakali@google.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFD] Task counter: cgroup core feature or cgroup subsystem? (was Re: [PATCH 0/8 v3] cgroups: Task counter subsystem)
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:06:12 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E65E284.50102@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALdu-PD0EBK7YvxeuxVw5Z21JvfqbgiUoR5Wh3Of-FhG+VE3zg@mail.gmail.com>

22:58, Paul Menage wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 12:28 AM, Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>>
>> I had a patchset that can make things even better. The patchset is
>> to bind/unbind a subsystem to/from an existing cgroup hierarchy.
> 
> Sigh, I'd been meaning to comment on that great patchset for ages, but
> they kind of slipped out of my attention :-( I'll try to look over
> them again - do they still apply cleanly after all the recent changes?
> 

I was interrupted by other work at that time and didn't continue to push the
patchset after that. I'll rebase the patchset and send it out.

> The bindability is orthogonal to the multi-subsystem support, I think
> - they definitely complement each other.
> 
> Paul
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-06  9:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-29 16:13 [PATCH 0/8 v3] cgroups: Task counter subsystem (was: New max number of tasks subsystem) Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-29 16:13 ` [PATCH 1/8] cgroups: Add res_counter_write_u64() API Frederic Weisbecker
2011-08-09 15:17   ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-08-09 17:31     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-29 16:13 ` [PATCH 2/8] cgroups: New resource counter inheritance API Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-29 16:13 ` [PATCH 3/8] cgroups: Add previous cgroup in can_attach_task/attach_task callbacks Frederic Weisbecker
2011-08-17  2:40   ` Li Zefan
2011-08-27 13:58     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-29 16:13 ` [PATCH 4/8] cgroups: New cancel_attach_task subsystem callback Frederic Weisbecker
2011-08-17  2:40   ` Li Zefan
2011-08-27 13:58     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-29 16:13 ` [PATCH 5/8] cgroups: Ability to stop res charge propagation on bounded ancestor Frederic Weisbecker
2011-08-17  2:41   ` Li Zefan
2011-08-27 13:59     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-29 16:13 ` [PATCH 6/8] cgroups: Add res counter common ancestor searching Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-29 16:13 ` [PATCH 7/8] cgroups: Add a task counter subsystem Frederic Weisbecker
2011-08-01 23:13   ` Andrew Morton
2011-08-04 14:05     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-08-09 15:11   ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-08-09 17:27     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-08-09 17:57       ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-08-09 18:09         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-08-09 18:19           ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-08-09 18:34             ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-08-09 18:39               ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-08-17  3:18   ` Li Zefan
2011-08-27 14:16     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-29 16:13 ` [PATCH 8/8] res_counter: Allow charge failure pointer to be null Frederic Weisbecker
2011-08-17  2:44   ` Li Zefan
2011-08-27 14:05     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-08-01 23:19 ` [PATCH 0/8 v3] cgroups: Task counter subsystem (was: New max number of tasks subsystem) Andrew Morton
2011-08-03 14:29   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-08-12 21:11   ` Tim Hockin
2011-08-16 16:01     ` Kay Sievers
2011-08-18 14:33       ` [RFD] Task counter: cgroup core feature or cgroup subsystem? (was Re: [PATCH 0/8 v3] cgroups: Task counter subsystem) Frederic Weisbecker
2011-08-23 16:07         ` Paul Menage
2011-08-24 17:54           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-08-26  7:28             ` Li Zefan
2011-08-26 14:58               ` Paul Menage
2011-09-06  9:06                 ` Li Zefan [this message]
2011-08-26 15:16             ` Paul Menage
2011-08-27 13:40               ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-08-31 22:36                 ` Paul Menage
2011-08-31 21:54               ` Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E65E284.50102@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=adityakali@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paul@paulmenage.org \
    --cc=thockin@hockin.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox