From: "Jun'ichi Nomura" <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>
To: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
jaxboe@fusionio.com, roland@purestorage.com,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@ct.jp.ne>
Subject: Re: [BUG] Oops when SCSI device under multipath is removed
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 09:00:58 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E6805BA.9040402@ce.jp.nec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110831195022.GE4004@oc1711230544.ibm.com>
Hello,
On 09/01/11 04:50, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 06:11:19PM +0900, Jun'ichi Nomura wrote:
>> Actually, Tejun has posted a patch to replace
>> execute_in_process_context() with queue_work()
>> and asking your review:
>>
>> [PATCH RESEND] scsi: don't use execute_in_process_context()
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/4/30/87
>>
>> Do you think you can take the patch and revert the move
>> of scsi_free_queue()?
>
> I've tested with your suggestion (reverting the move of scsi_free_queue)
> and it works like a charm. I did not get any oops after that. I tested
> with a multipath setup on top of two iscsi targets. Using dd after
> logging out of some of one of the iscsi targets would trigger the oops.
> With this patch, it could not be triggered anymore.
Thank you for testing and the report.
Since scsi_free_queue() frees elevator, calling it while there
still is a user of the elevator has no way to work.
Either we should call it later (like the above suggestion)
or change scsi_free_queue not to free the elevator
(James posted a patch early in this thread).
I think the latter approach could be nice if it worked.
But if not, the former approach should be taken.
Without fix, a path failure can cause a panic. This is bad...
Best regards,
--
Jun'ichi Nomura, NEC Corporation
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-08 0:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-10 4:29 [BUG] Oops when SCSI device under multipath is removed Jun'ichi Nomura
2011-08-10 19:52 ` James Bottomley
2011-08-11 0:24 ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2011-08-11 3:01 ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2011-08-11 14:33 ` James Bottomley
2011-08-11 14:59 ` Alan Stern
2011-08-11 15:05 ` James Bottomley
2011-08-11 15:16 ` Alan Stern
2011-08-16 11:26 ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2011-08-18 9:11 ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2011-08-31 19:50 ` Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2011-09-08 0:00 ` Jun'ichi Nomura [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E6805BA.9040402@ce.jp.nec.com \
--to=j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=cascardo@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
--cc=k-ueda@ct.jp.ne \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roland@purestorage.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox