Re: [PATCH 2/3] nbd: add support for feature negotiation

Paolo Bonzini
2011-09-08T07:00:48Z

On 09/07/2011 11:54 PM, Paul Clements wrote:
>> > I named it differently intentionally, actually, because it should not use
>> > the flags field from the network protocol as is. Also, "features" sounds
>> > more like something that is optional, while unrecognized "flags" should
>> > probably cause a failure.
> Alright, I can buy that argument -- I don't feel that strongly about it...
>
> This looks good to me, then.

Actually no, I can do better. :)

Paolo