public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
To: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
	Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: zram: fix zram locking
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 10:05:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E687754.1040005@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E681BC9.4010901@vflare.org>

On 09/08/2011 03:35 AM, Nitin Gupta wrote:
> On 09/06/2011 09:02 AM, Jerome Marchand wrote:
>> Currently init_lock only prevents concurrent execution of zram_init_device()
>> and zram_reset_device() but not zram_make_request() nor sysfs store functions.
>>
> 
> zram_make_request() initializes the device first time it is used and 
> from then on no sysfs config writes are allowed till the device is reset 
> -- for example, you cannot change disksize while a disk is in 
> initialized state. So, I could not understand why we need to protect 
> zram_make_request vs sysfs stores.

This is true for disksize_store() (which can race with zram_init_device(), thus
the write lock in it), not for reset_store(), which obviously can happen in
initialized state. I have actually hit those races with the following
reproducer:

---
#! /bin/sh

while true; do
    for i in `seq 0 9`; do
	echo 1 > /sys/block/zram0/reset&
	echo $((1024*1024*500)) > /sys/block/zram0/disksize&
	for i in `seq 1 10`; do
	    dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/zram0 bs=4k count=1 2>/dev/null;
	done
    done;
    wait;
done


> 
> Thanks,
> Nitin
> 
> 
> 


      reply	other threads:[~2011-09-08  8:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-06 13:02 [PATCH 1/2] staging: zram: fix zram locking Jerome Marchand
2011-09-06 13:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] staging: zram: prevent accessing an unallocated table when init fails early Jerome Marchand
2011-09-08  1:35 ` [PATCH 1/2] staging: zram: fix zram locking Nitin Gupta
2011-09-08  8:05   ` Jerome Marchand [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E687754.1040005@redhat.com \
    --to=jmarchan@redhat.com \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ngupta@vflare.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox