From: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
To: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: zram: fix zram locking
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 10:05:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E687754.1040005@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E681BC9.4010901@vflare.org>
On 09/08/2011 03:35 AM, Nitin Gupta wrote:
> On 09/06/2011 09:02 AM, Jerome Marchand wrote:
>> Currently init_lock only prevents concurrent execution of zram_init_device()
>> and zram_reset_device() but not zram_make_request() nor sysfs store functions.
>>
>
> zram_make_request() initializes the device first time it is used and
> from then on no sysfs config writes are allowed till the device is reset
> -- for example, you cannot change disksize while a disk is in
> initialized state. So, I could not understand why we need to protect
> zram_make_request vs sysfs stores.
This is true for disksize_store() (which can race with zram_init_device(), thus
the write lock in it), not for reset_store(), which obviously can happen in
initialized state. I have actually hit those races with the following
reproducer:
---
#! /bin/sh
while true; do
for i in `seq 0 9`; do
echo 1 > /sys/block/zram0/reset&
echo $((1024*1024*500)) > /sys/block/zram0/disksize&
for i in `seq 1 10`; do
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/zram0 bs=4k count=1 2>/dev/null;
done
done;
wait;
done
>
> Thanks,
> Nitin
>
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-08 8:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-06 13:02 [PATCH 1/2] staging: zram: fix zram locking Jerome Marchand
2011-09-06 13:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] staging: zram: prevent accessing an unallocated table when init fails early Jerome Marchand
2011-09-08 1:35 ` [PATCH 1/2] staging: zram: fix zram locking Nitin Gupta
2011-09-08 8:05 ` Jerome Marchand [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E687754.1040005@redhat.com \
--to=jmarchan@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ngupta@vflare.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox