From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933877Ab1IIMCS (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Sep 2011 08:02:18 -0400 Received: from mx2.parallels.com ([64.131.90.16]:37993 "EHLO mx2.parallels.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933764Ab1IIMCR (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Sep 2011 08:02:17 -0400 Message-ID: <4E6A001C.2040600@parallels.com> Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 09:01:32 -0300 From: Glauber Costa User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110816 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki CC: , , , , , "David S. Miller" , "Eric W. Biederman" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] per-cgroup tcp buffers control References: <1315369399-3073-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <1315369399-3073-7-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <20110909121206.e1d628d1.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <20110909121206.e1d628d1.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [187.106.51.14] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/09/2011 12:12 AM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 01:23:16 -0300 > Glauber Costa wrote: > >> With all the infrastructure in place, this patch implements >> per-cgroup control for tcp memory pressure handling. >> >> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa >> CC: David S. Miller >> CC: Hiroyouki Kamezawa >> CC: Eric W. Biederman > > Hmm, then, kmem_cgroup.c is just a caller of plugins implemented > by other components ? Kame, Refer to my discussion with Greg. How would you feel about it being accounted to a single "kernel memory" limit in memcg? Thanks!