public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Breno Leitao <brenohl@br.ibm.com>
To: Lucas Kannebley Tavares <lucaskt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Thadeu Lima De Souza Cascardo <cascardo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] jsm: Fixed EEH recovery error
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:31:24 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E6E25CC.5020101@br.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1315834565-9280-1-git-send-email-lucaskt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On 09/12/2011 10:36 AM, Lucas Kannebley Tavares wrote:
> There was an error on the jsm driver that would cause it to be unable to
> recover after a second error is detected.
>
> At the first error, the device recovers properly:
>
> [72521.485691] EEH: Detected PCI bus error on device 0003:02:00.0
> [72521.485695] EEH: This PCI device has failed 1 times in the last hour:
> ...
> [72532.035693] ttyn3 at MMIO 0x0 (irq = 49) is a jsm
> [72532.105689] jsm: Port 3 added
>
> However, at the second error, it cascades until EEH disables the device:
>
> [72631.229549] Call Trace:
> ...
> [72641.725687] jsm: Port 3 added
> [72641.725695] EEH: Detected PCI bus error on device 0003:02:00.0
> [72641.725698] EEH: This PCI device has failed 3 times in the last hour:
>
> It was caused because the PCI state was not being saved after the first
> restore. Therefore, at the second recovery the PCI state would not be
> restored.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas Kannebley Tavares<lucaskt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <brenohl@br.ibm.com>


       reply	other threads:[~2011-09-12 15:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1315834565-9280-1-git-send-email-lucaskt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2011-09-12 15:31 ` Breno Leitao [this message]
2011-09-12 15:35 ` [PATCH] jsm: Fixed EEH recovery error Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2012-01-06 20:43   ` Lucas Kannebley Tavares
2012-01-06 21:04     ` Greg KH
2011-10-03 16:52 Lucas Kannebley Tavares
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-01-09 12:58 Lucas Kannebley Tavares

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E6E25CC.5020101@br.ibm.com \
    --to=brenohl@br.ibm.com \
    --cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=cascardo@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lucaskt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox