From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932623Ab1IMUio (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Sep 2011 16:38:44 -0400 Received: from claw.goop.org ([74.207.240.146]:35589 "EHLO claw.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932560Ab1IMUim (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Sep 2011 16:38:42 -0400 Message-ID: <4E6FBF4E.7000103@goop.org> Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:38:38 -0700 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110906 Thunderbird/6.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Manoj Iyer CC: Chris Ball , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: SDHCI regression since 2.6.39 References: <4E6EA3E4.5080401@goop.org> <4E6F8C24.3090207@goop.org> <4E6FA44F.1050705@goop.org> <4E6FBCA1.6040307@goop.org> In-Reply-To: <4E6FBCA1.6040307@goop.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/13/2011 01:27 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > I have 1.17 installed at the moment. It looks like 1.21 is current, so > I could try updating it. But the Fedora 15 2.6.38 kernel worked fine > with this controller and cards, so I don't think BIOS version is an > issue. Also, there's nothing obviously related to the SD controller in > the release notes (not that I trust their competeness). ...but in preparation for doing a bisection, I can't actually find a kernel version which works any more. So... I'm not sure what changed. Maybe it was the BIOS. J